Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 73
FIELDING v. the United Kingdom
FIELDING v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/01/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2570
G.M. AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
G.M. AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 22/02/2023 00:00:00 06/03/2023 09:48:32 Case Description: This case concerns forced abortions and birth control imposed in the period from 1998 to 2007 to three applicants with intellectual disabilities who EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62749
GRANT v. the United Kingdom
GRANT v. the United Kingdom GBR 23/08/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure to recognise legally the change of gender of a post operative male to female transsexual person and the refusal to pay her a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2868
HULEA v. Romania
HULEA v. Romania ROU 02/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Discrimination: Refusal by competent court to award compensation for the non pecuniary damage caused by the national authorities rejection of a male army employee s request for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16901
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894
J.L. v. Italy
J.L. v. Italy ITA 27/08/2021 00:00:00 17/09/2021 10:48:18 Case Description: The case concerned criminal proceedings between 2008 and 2015 against seven men who had been charged with the gang rape of the applicant and had been acquitted by the Italian EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58375
JURCIC v. Croatia
JURCIC v. Croatia HRV 04/05/2021 00:00:00 21/05/2021 14:55:48 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property rights: Direct discrimination on the ground of sex with regard to the denial to a woman having undergone in vitro fertilisation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57631
K.H. AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
K.H. AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 06/11/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal of authorities to allow eight women of Roma ethnic origin to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8547
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KHANH v. Cyprus
KHANH v. Cyprus CYP 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: These cases mainly concern the poor conditions of the applicants detention pending deportation violation of Article 3 of the Convention . The Khanh case concerns the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50919
LEÓN MADRID v. Spain
LE N MADRID v. Spain ESP 26/01/2022 00:00:00 11/02/2022 10:40:32 Case Description: On 9 November 2005 the applicant gave birth to a daughter who was registered under the mother s two surnames paternal and maternal . In a judgment of 14 February 2007 the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59635
LEARY v. the United Kingdom
LEARY v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/07/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2586
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
LEVENTOGLU ABDULKADIROGLU v. Turkey
LEVENTOGLU ABDULKADIROGLU v. Turkey TUR 28/08/2013 00:00:00 09/11/2016 18:09:22 Case Description: Protection against discrimination and protection of private and family life: Impossibility for married women to bear only their maiden name. Article 14 in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36499
LOFFELMAN v. the United Kingdom
LOFFELMAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/03/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2622
M. G. C. v. Romania
M. G. C. v. Romania ROU 15/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Judgments: M.G.C. v. Romania No. 61495/11 final on 15/06/2016 I.C. v. Romania No. 36934/08 final on 24/08/2016 These cases concern breaches of the State s positive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13219
M.G. v. Turkey
M.G. v. Turkey TUR 22/06/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: Repetitive case. Relevant leading cases with detailed information on status of execution including examinations by the Committee of Ministers are presented below. Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36794
M.S.S. v. Belgium
M.S.S. v. Belgium BEL 21/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-41571
M.S.S. v. Greece
M.S.S. v. Greece GRC 21/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1219
MATTHEWS v. the United Kingdom
MATTHEWS v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/07/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex due to the applicant s lack of entitlement to travel free on public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2602