Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
H.H., I.H. and Y.H. v. Georgia
H.H. I.H. and Y.H. v. Georgia CEDAW/C/80/D/140/2019 Communication number s : 140/2019 Author: H.H. I.H. and Y.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Georgia Submission date 19 Sep 2018 Date of decision 25 Oct 2021 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/80/D/140/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3044/en-US
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US
Richard Sahlin v. Sweden
Richard Sahlin v. Sweden CRPD/C/23/D/45/2018 Communication number s : 45/2018 Author: Richard Sahlin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Sweden Submission date 23 Jan 2018 Date of decision 21 Aug 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/45/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3074/en-US
S.S. and P.S. v. Canada
S.S. and P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/62/D/702/2015 Communication number s : 702/2015 Author: S.S. and P.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Canada Submission date 04 Oct 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/702/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2402/en-US
Vargay v. Canada
Vargay v. Canada CCPR/C/96/D/1639/2007 Communication number s : 1639/2007 Author: Peter Zsolt Vargay Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 96 Country Canada Submission date 09 Oct 2007 Date of decision 28 Jul 2009 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1639/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1520/en-US
Y.W. v. Denmark
Y.W. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013 Communication number s : 051/2013 Author: Y.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jan 2013 Date of decision 02 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2052/en-US