Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
Bujdosó v. Hungary
Bujdos v. Hungary CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011 Communication number s : 004/2011 Author: J nos Fiala Disability Rights Center Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Hungary Submission date 14 Sep 2011 Date of decision 09 Sep 2013 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/10/D/4/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1988/en-US
Elisabeth de Blok et al v. Netherlands
Elisabeth de Blok et al v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/57/D/36/2012 Communication number s : 036/2012 Author: Elisabeth de Blok et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Netherlands Submission date 24 Nov 2011 Date of decision 17 Feb 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/36/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1823/en-US
G.B.M. v. Sweden
G.B.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/435/2010 Communication number s : 435/2010 Author: G.B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 05 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/435/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/16/en-US
Käkkäläjärvi et al. v. Finland
K kk l j rvi et al. v. Finland CCPR/C/124/D/2950/2017 Communication number s : 2950/2017 Author: Klemetti K kk l j rvi et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Finland Submission date 23 Mar 2016 Date of decision 02 Nov 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2950/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3322/en-US
Masih Shakeel v. Canada
Masih Shakeel v. Canada CCPR/C/108/D/1881/2009 Communication number s : 1881/2009 Author: Masih Shakeel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 24 Jul 2013 Comment: The texts of two JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1881/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1670/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US