Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
Danning v. Netherlands
Danning v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/180/1984 Communication number s : 180/1984 Author: L.G. Danning Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Jul 1984 Date of decision 09 Apr 1987 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/180/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/537/en-US
Follow-up report v. Finland,Spain,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Finland Spain Switzerland CRC/C/90/2 Communication number s : 26/2017 28/2017 38/2017 40/2018 51/2018 56/2018 63/2018 76/2019 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 90 Country Finland Spain Switzerland Submission date JUTBCRC/C/90/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3560/en-US
H.L. v. Australia
H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US
M.A.K. v. Germany
M.A.K. v. Germany CAT/C/32/D/214/2002 Communication number s : 214/2002 Author: M.A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Germany Submission date 10 Sep 2002 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/214/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/155/en-US
S.Y. v. Netherlands
S.Y. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/123/D/2392/2014 Communication number s : 2392/2014 Author: S.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Jan 2014 Date of decision 17 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2392/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2523/en-US
Shafiq v. Australia
Shafiq v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1324/2004 Communication number s : 1324/2004 Author: Danyal Shafiq Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 05 Nov 2004 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1324/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1308/en-US