Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
E. B. v. New Zealand
E. B. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005 Communication number s : 1368/2005 Author: E. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country New Zealand Submission date 24 Dec 2004 Date of decision 16 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1333/en-US
J.M. v. Chile
J.M. v. Chile CRC/C/90/D/121/2020 Communication number s : 121/2020 Author: N.E.R. . Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Chile Submission date 09 Jul 2020 Date of decision 01 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/90/D/121/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3055/en-US
Jallow v. Denmark
Jallow v. Denmark CERD/C/108/D/62/2018 Communication number s : 62/2018 Author: Momodou Jallow Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Sep 2017 Date of decision 01 Dec 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/108/D/62/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3576/en-US
S.S. v. Netherlands
S.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/30/D/191/2001 Communication number s : 191/2001 Author: S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Sep 2001 Date of decision 05 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/191/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/172/en-US
Salgado v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Salgado v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/37/D/11/2006 Communication number s : 011/2006 Author: Constance Ragan Salgado Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 37 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and JUTBCEDAW/C/37/D/11/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1713/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US