Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia CRPD/C/20/D/38/2016 Communication number s : 038/2016 Author: Al Adam Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Saudi Arabia Submission date 05 May 2016 Date of decision 20 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/38/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2513/en-US
El Abani (El Ouerfeli) v. Libya
El Abani El Ouerfeli v. Libya CCPR/C/99/D/1640/2007 Communication number s : 1640/2007 Author: Abdelhakim Wanis El Abani El Ouerfeli Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Libya Submission date 15 Oct 2007 Date of decision 26 Jul 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1640/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1523/en-US
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US
Lars-Anders Ã…gren et al. v. Sweden
Lars Anders gren et al. v. Sweden CERD/C/102/D/54/2013 Communication number s : 54/2013 Author: Lars Anders gren et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Sep 2013 Date of decision 18 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/102/D/54/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3021/en-US
Singh v. France
Singh v. France CCPR/C/102/D/1876/2009 Communication number s : 1876/2009 Author: Ranjit Singh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country France Submission date 15 Dec 2008 Date of decision 22 Jul 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1876/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1212/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US