Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
C.O.D. v. Chile
C.O.D. v. Chile CRC/C/92/D/129/2020 Communication number s : 129/2020 Author: C.O.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 92 Country Chile Submission date 27 Sep 2020 Date of decision 25 Jan 2023 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/92/D/129/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3748/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Brazil
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Brazil CRC/C/88/D/105/2019 Communication number s : 105/2019 Author: Chiara Sacchi Catarina Lorenzo Iris Duquesne Raina Ivanova Ridhima Pandey David Ackley III Ranton Anjain Litokne Kabua Deborah Adegbile Carlos Manuel Ayakha JUTBCRC/C/88/D/105/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2953/en-US
J.M. v. Chile
J.M. v. Chile CRC/C/90/D/121/2020 Communication number s : 121/2020 Author: N.E.R. . Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Chile Submission date 09 Jul 2020 Date of decision 01 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/90/D/121/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3055/en-US
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia CCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007 Communication number s : 1557/2007 Author: Stefan Lars Nystrom represented by the Human Rights Law Resource Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Australia Submission JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1211/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US