Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
Aumeeruddy-Cziffra et al. v. Mauritius
Aumeeruddy Cziffra et al. v. Mauritius CCPR/C/12/D/35/1978 Communication number s : 035/1978 Author: Shirin Aumeeruddy Cziffra and 19 other Mauritian women Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 Country Mauritius Submission date 02 May 1978 JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/35/1978https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/319/en-US
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
Follow-up report v. Finland,Spain,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Finland Spain Switzerland CRC/C/90/2 Communication number s : 26/2017 28/2017 38/2017 40/2018 51/2018 56/2018 63/2018 76/2019 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 90 Country Finland Spain Switzerland Submission date JUTBCRC/C/90/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3560/en-US
Follow-up report v. Spain
Follow up report v. Spain CRC/C/88/2 Communication number s : 17/2017 21/2017 24/2017 25/2017 27/2017 4/2016 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 88 Country Spain Submission date Date of decision 24 Sep 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/88/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3562/en-US
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands CCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014 Communication number s : 2489/2014 Author: Jamshed Hashemi and Maryam Hashemi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Jul 2013 Date of decision 26 JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3321/en-US
J.R.R. and L.A.A. v. Denmark
J.R.R. and L.A.A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/132/D/2787/2016 Communication number s : 2787/2016 Author: J.R.R. and L.A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Jul 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: Joint JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2787/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3183/en-US
M.M.K. v. Sweden
M.M.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/221/2002 Communication number s : 221/2002 Author: M.M.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 19 Nov 2002 Date of decision 03 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/221/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/134/en-US
Madafferi v. Australia
Madafferi v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001 Communication number s : 1011/2001 Author: Francesco Madafferi and Anna Maria Immacolata Madafferi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2001 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1123/en-US
Stewart v. Canada
Stewart v. Canada CCPR/C/58/D/538/1993 Communication number s : 538/1993 Author: Charles E. Stewart Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Canada Submission date 18 Feb 1993 Date of decision 01 Nov 1996 Comment: Five individual JUTBCCPR/C/58/D/538/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/551/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CAT/C/53/D/511/2012 Communication number s : 511/2012 Author: Z. represented by Norman Gibson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 53 Country Australia Submission date 29 Sep 2011 Date of decision 26 Nov 2014 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/53/D/511/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2057/en-US
v. Denmark
v. Denmark CAT/C/52/D/466/2011 Communication number s : 466/2011 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/466/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1829/en-US