Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 481 - 500 of 580
Sivagnanaratnam v. Denmark
Sivagnanaratnam v. Denmark CAT/C/51/D/429/2010 Communication number s : 429/2010 Author: Mallikathevi Sivagnanaratnam Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Aug 2010 Date of decision 11 Nov 2013 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/51/D/429/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1/en-US
Sogi v. Canada,India
Sogi v. Canada India CAT/C/39/D/297/2006 Communication number s : 297/2006 Author: Bachan Singh Sogi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Canada India Submission date 11 Jun 2006 Date of decision 16 Nov 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/39/D/297/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/85/en-US
Sonia Yaker v. France
Sonia Yaker v. France CCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016 Communication number s : 2747/2016 Author: Sonia Yaker Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country France Submission date 22 Feb 2016 Date of decision 17 Jul 2018 Comment: The following are JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2547/en-US
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia CCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007 Communication number s : 1557/2007 Author: Stefan Lars Nystrom represented by the Human Rights Law Resource Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Australia Submission JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1211/en-US
Stewart v. Canada
Stewart v. Canada CCPR/C/58/D/538/1993 Communication number s : 538/1993 Author: Charles E. Stewart Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Canada Submission date 18 Feb 1993 Date of decision 01 Nov 1996 Comment: Five individual JUTBCCPR/C/58/D/538/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/551/en-US
Stow v. Portugal
Stow v. Portugal CCPR/C/92/D/1496/2006 Communication number s : 1496/2006 Author: Dilwyn Stow Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 92 Country Portugal Submission date 04 May 2006 Date of decision 01 Apr 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1496/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1416/en-US
Surgan v. Belarus
Surgan v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/1969/2010 Communication number s : 1969/2010 Author: Taras Surgan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 28 May 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1969/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2011/en-US
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009 Communication number s : 1910/2009 Author: Svetlana Zhuk Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Oct 2009 Date of decision 30 Oct 2013 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1689/en-US
Sviridov v. Kazakhstan
Sviridov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/120/D/2158/2012 Communication number s : 2158/2012 Author: Andrei Sviridov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 23 Feb 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2158/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2305/en-US
T.J. v. Lithuania
T.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009 Communication number s : 1911/2009 Author: T.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Lithuania Submission date 12 Sep 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1329/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/228/2003 Communication number s : 228/2003 Author: T.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Mar 2003 Date of decision 18 Nov 2003 Comment: Committee member Mr. Fernando Mari o Men JUTBCAT/C/31/D/228/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/154/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.P.S. v. Canada
T.P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/24/D/99/1997 Communication number s : 099/1997 Author: T.P.S. name withheld Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 19 Nov 1997 Date of decision 16 May 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCAT/C/24/D/99/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/216/en-US
T.T. v. Ukraine
T.T. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/134/D/2985/2017 Communication number s : 2985/2017 Author: T.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Ukraine Submission date 19 Apr 2017 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2985/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3686/en-US
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia CCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010 Communication number s : 1963/2010 Author: T.W. and G.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Slovakia Submission date 23 Feb 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1812/en-US
T v. New Zealand
T v. New Zealand CCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015 Communication number s : 2684/2015 Author: T Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3316/en-US
Taito Fa’afete v. New Zealand
Taito Fa afete v. New Zealand CCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009 Communication number s : 1909/2009 Author: Tony Ellis counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country New Zealand Submission date 12 May 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1983/en-US
Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband, Boris Shikhmuradov v. Turkmenistan
Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband Boris Shikhmuradov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/112/D/2069/2011 Communication number s : 2069/2011 Author: Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband Boris Shikhmuradov not represented by counsel Type of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2069/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1907/en-US