Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 18 of 18
A.M.M. v. Denmark
A.M.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2415/2014 Communication number s : 2415/2014 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jun 2014 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2415/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2231/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2357/2014 Communication number s : 2357/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Mar 2014 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2357/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2114/en-US
Dar v. Norway
Dar v. Norway CAT/C/38/D/249/2004 Communication number s : 249/2004 Author: Nadeem Ahmad Dar Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country Norway Submission date 29 Mar 2004 Date of decision 11 May 2007 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/38/D/249/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/98/en-US
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
Elahi v. Switzerland
Elahi v. Switzerland CAT/C/34/D/222/2002 Communication number s : 222/2002 Author: Zubair Elahi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Switzerland Submission date 28 Nov 2002 Date of decision 03 May 2005 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/34/D/222/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/132/en-US
F.K.A. v. Canada
F.K.A. v. Canada CAT/C/65/D/784/2016 Communication number s : 784/2016 Author: F.K.A. represented by counsel Mr. Zoheir Snasni Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Canada Submission date 07 Nov 2016 Date of decision 15 Nov 2018 JUTBCAT/C/65/D/784/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2473/en-US
G.A. v. Australia
G.A. v. Australia CAT/C/64/D/680/2015 Communication number s : 680/2015 Author: G.A. represented by counsel John Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Australia Submission date 15 May 2015 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/680/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2464/en-US
H. v. Sweden
H. v. Sweden CAT/C/58/D/627/2014 Communication number s : 627/2014 Author: H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Aug 2014 Date of decision 05 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/627/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3012/en-US
I.K. v. Denmark
I.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/125/D/2373/2014 Communication number s : 2373/2014 Author: I.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Feb 2014 Date of decision 18 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2373/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2915/en-US
J.S. v. Canada
J.S. v. Canada CAT/C/62/D/695/2015 Communication number s : 695/2015 Author: J.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Canada Submission date 10 Aug 2015 Date of decision 28 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/695/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2412/en-US
M.A.K. v. Belgium
M.A.K. v. Belgium CCPR/C/119/D/2148/2012 Communication number s : 2148/2012 Author: M.A.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Belgium Submission date 22 Nov 2011 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2148/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2262/en-US
M.A. v. Denmark
M.A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2240/2013 Communication number s : 2240/2013 Author: M.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 12 Apr 2013 Date of decision 17 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2240/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2302/en-US
S.K. and R.K. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
S.K. and R.K. v. Afghanistan Sweden CAT/C/47/D/365/2008 Communication number s : 365/2008 Author: S.K. and R.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 47 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 19 Nov 2008 Date of decision 21 Nov 2011 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/47/D/365/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/43/en-US
S.S. and P.S. v. Canada
S.S. and P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/62/D/702/2015 Communication number s : 702/2015 Author: S.S. and P.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Canada Submission date 04 Oct 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/702/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2402/en-US
V. v. Denmark
V. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013 Communication number s : 57/2013 Author: V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Aug 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3030/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
Z.H. v. Canada
Z.H. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/604/2014 Communication number s : 604/2014 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 18 May 2014 Date of decision 20 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/56/D/604/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2071/en-US
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia CERD/C/55/D/6/1995 Communication number s : 6/1995 Author: Z.U.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jan 1995 Date of decision 26 Dec 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/55/D/6/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3024/en-US