Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 11 of 11
A.H. and S.H. v. France
A.H. and S.H. v. France CAT/C/73/D/933/2019 Communication number s : 933/2019 Author: A.H. and S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country France Submission date 14 May 2019 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/73/D/933/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3335/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Spain
Ali Aarrass v. Spain CCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010 Communication number s : 2008/2010 Author: Ali Aarrass Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Spain Submission date 25 Nov 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1860/en-US
G.B. v. Latvia
G.B. v. Latvia CCPR/C/133/D/3124/2018 Communication number s : 3124/2018 Author: G.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 133 Country Latvia Submission date 12 Oct 2017 Date of decision 05 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3124/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3153/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
H.H., I.H. and Y.H. v. Georgia
H.H. I.H. and Y.H. v. Georgia CEDAW/C/80/D/140/2019 Communication number s : 140/2019 Author: H.H. I.H. and Y.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Georgia Submission date 19 Sep 2018 Date of decision 25 Oct 2021 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/80/D/140/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3044/en-US
Polish Society of Anti-Discrimination Law v. Poland
Polish Society of Anti Discrimination Law v. Poland CEDAW/C/73/D/136/2018 Communication number s : 136/2018 Author: Polish Society of Anti Discrimination Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Poland Submission date 13 Sep JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/136/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2660/en-US
Sayadi and Vinck v. Belgium
Sayadi and Vinck v. Belgium CCPR/C/94/D/1472/2006 Communication number s : 1472/2006 Author: Nabil Sayadi and Patricia Vinck Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 94 Country Belgium Submission date 14 Mar 2006 Date of decision 22 Oct 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1472/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1477/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US