Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
D.R. v. Australia
D.R. v. Australia CRPD/C/17/D/14/2013 Communication number s : 014/2013 Author: Philip French Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 17 Country Australia Submission date 14 Aug 2013 Date of decision 24 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/17/D/14/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2387/en-US
G.B.M. v. Sweden
G.B.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/435/2010 Communication number s : 435/2010 Author: G.B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 05 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/435/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/16/en-US
H.M. v. Sweden
H.M. v. Sweden CRPD/C/7/D/3/2011 Communication number s : 003/2011 Author: H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 7 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Dec 2009 Date of decision 19 Apr 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRPD/C/7/D/3/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1984/en-US
Laing v. Australia
Laing v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/901/1999 Communication number s : 901/1999 Author: Deborah Joy Laing Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 30 Nov 1999 Date of decision 09 Jul 2004 Comment: Two individual JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/901/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1091/en-US
M.N. v. Denmark
M.N. v. Denmark CCPR/C/132/D/3188/2018 Communication number s : 3188/2018 Author: M.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Denmark Submission date 22 May 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3188/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3182/en-US
Marie-Louise Jüngelin v. Sweden
Marie Louise J ngelin v. Sweden CRPD/C/12/D/5/2011 Communication number s : 005/2011 Author: Swedish Association of Visually Impaired Youth US and the Swedish Association of the Visually Impaired SRF Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 JUTBCRPD/C/12/D/5/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2006/en-US
R.G. et al. v. Sweden
R.G. et al. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/586/2014 Communication number s : 586/2014 Author: R.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/56/D/586/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2068/en-US
S.M., H.M. and A.M. v. Azerbaijan,Sweden
S.M. H.M. and A.M. v. Azerbaijan Sweden CAT/C/47/D/374/2009 Communication number s : 374/2009 Author: S.M. H.M. and A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 47 Country Azerbaijan Sweden Submission date 11 Nov 2008 Date of decision 21 Nov 2011 JUTBCAT/C/47/D/374/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/45/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US