Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
D.R. v. Australia
D.R. v. Australia CRPD/C/17/D/14/2013 Communication number s : 014/2013 Author: Philip French Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 17 Country Australia Submission date 14 Aug 2013 Date of decision 24 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/17/D/14/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2387/en-US
H.M. v. Sweden
H.M. v. Sweden CRPD/C/7/D/3/2011 Communication number s : 003/2011 Author: H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 7 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Dec 2009 Date of decision 19 Apr 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRPD/C/7/D/3/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1984/en-US
Richard Sahlin v. Sweden
Richard Sahlin v. Sweden CRPD/C/23/D/45/2018 Communication number s : 45/2018 Author: Richard Sahlin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Sweden Submission date 23 Jan 2018 Date of decision 21 Aug 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/45/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3074/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US