Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 88
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Aouf v. Belgium
Aouf v. Belgium CCPR/C/86/D/1010/2001 Communication number s : 1010/2001 Author: Lass ad Aouf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belgium Submission date 22 May 2001 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1010/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1201/en-US
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Bellini v. Italy
Bellini v. Italy CRPD/C/27/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 51/2018 Author: Maria Simona Bellini Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Italy Submission date 28 Mar 2017 Date of decision 26 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/27/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3604/en-US
Bessis v. France
Bessis v. France CCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018 Communication number s : 3215/2018 Author: Philippe Rudyard Bessis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country France Submission date 26 Oct 2017 Date of decision 13 Oct 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3114/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
Cox v. Canada
Cox v. Canada CCPR/C/52/D/539/1993 Communication number s : 539/1993 Author: Keith Cox Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jan 1993 Date of decision 31 Oct 1994 Comment: 8 individual opinions were submitted JUTBCCPR/C/52/D/539/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/576/en-US
Crochet v. France
Crochet v. France CCPR/C/100/D/1777/2008 Communication number s : 1777/2008 Author: Roger Crochet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country France Submission date 28 Dec 2007 Date of decision 25 Oct 2010 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1777/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1605/en-US
D.G. v. Netherlands
D.G. v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/61/D/52/2013 Communication number s : 052/2013 Author: D.G. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 61 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Aug 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/52/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2055/en-US
D.S. v. Slovakia
D.S. v. Slovakia CEDAW/C/65/D/66/2014 Communication number s : 66/2014 Author: D.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Slovakia Submission date 08 Feb 2013 Date of decision 07 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/65/D/66/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3451/en-US
D.S. v. Sweden
D.S. v. Sweden CERD/C/59/D/14/1998 Communication number s : 014/1998 021/2001 Author: D.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Sweden Submission date 24 Dec 1998 Date of decision 10 Aug 2001 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/59/D/14/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1749/en-US
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador CCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013 Communication number s : 2244/2013 Author: Roberto Isa as Dassum and William Isa as Dassum Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ecuador Submission date 12 Mar 2012 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3094/en-US
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
Dumont v. Canada
Dumont v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1467/2006 Communication number s : 1467/2006 Author: Michel Dumont Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 17 Mar 2006 Date of decision 16 Mar 2010 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1467/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1582/en-US
E. B. v. New Zealand
E. B. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005 Communication number s : 1368/2005 Author: E. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country New Zealand Submission date 24 Dec 2004 Date of decision 16 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1333/en-US
E.M.M.A. v. Sweden
E.M.M.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/960/2019 Communication number s : 960/2019 Author: E.M.M.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 03 Oct 2019 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/960/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3326/en-US