Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 541 - 560 of 650
T.S. v. Netherlands
T.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/71/D/896/2018 Communication number s : 896/2018 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Nov 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/896/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3374/en-US
T.Z. v. Switzerland
T.Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/688/2015 Communication number s : 688/2015 Author: T.Z. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 07 Jul 2015 Date of decision 22 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/688/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2334/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
Tebourski v. France
Tebourski v. France CAT/C/38/D/300/2006 Communication number s : 300/2006 Author: Adel Tebourski Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country France Submission date 23 Jul 2006 Date of decision 01 May 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/38/D/300/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/96/en-US
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia CAT/C/72/D/944/2019 Communication number s : 944/2019 Author: Niroshanth Tharchanamoorthy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/944/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3341/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Thuraisamy v. Canada
Thuraisamy v. Canada CCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009 Communication number s : 1912/2009 Author: Ganesaratnam Thuraisamy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Canada Submission date 28 Oct 2009 Date of decision 31 Oct 2012 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1353/en-US
Tony Chahin v. Sweden
Tony Chahin v. Sweden CAT/C/46/D/310/2007 Communication number s : 310/2007 Author: Tony Chahin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Sweden Submission date 20 Dec 2006 Date of decision 30 May 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/46/D/310/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1789/en-US
Truong v. Canada
Truong v. Canada CCPR/C/77/D/743/1997 Communication number s : 743/1997 Author: Ngoc Si Truong Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country Canada Submission date 26 Apr 1996 Date of decision 28 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/743/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1035/en-US
Tursunov v. Kazakhstan,Uzbekistan
Tursunov v. Kazakhstan Uzbekistan CAT/C/54/D/538/2013 Communication number s : 538/2013 Author: Khairullo Tursunov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Kazakhstan Uzbekistan Submission date 14 Feb 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 JUTBCAT/C/54/D/538/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1949/en-US
U.A. v. Canada
U.A. v. Canada CAT/C/63/D/767/2016 Communication number s : 767/2016 Author: U.A. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Canada Submission date 16 Aug 2016 Date of decision 17 May 2018 JUTBCAT/C/63/D/767/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2744/en-US
U.S. v. Finland
U.S. v. Finland CAT/C/30/D/197/2002 Communication number s : 197/2002 Author: U.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Finland Submission date 07 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/197/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/168/en-US
Uttam Mondal v. Sweden
Uttam Mondal v. Sweden CAT/C/46/D/338/2008 Communication number s : 338/2008 Author: Uttam Mondal Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Sweden Submission date 30 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 May 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/46/D/338/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/52/en-US
V.D. v. Russian Federation
V.D. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/116/D/2198/2012 Communication number s : 2198/2012 Author: V.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Russian Federation Submission date 23 Sep 2012 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2198/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3090/en-US
V.L. v. Switzerland
V.L. v. Switzerland CAT/C/37/D/262/2005 Communication number s : 262/2005 Author: V.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 Jan 2005 Date of decision 20 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/262/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/101/en-US
V.M., G.M., S.M. and T.M. v. Sweden
V.M. G.M. S.M. and T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/71/D/883/2018 Communication number s : 883/2018 Author: V.M. G.M. S.M. and T.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Sweden Submission date 31 Aug 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/883/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3370/en-US
V.M. v. Australia
V.M. v. Australia CAT/C/67/D/723/2015 Communication number s : 723/2015 Author: V.M. represented by counsel John Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Australia Submission date 30 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/723/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2626/en-US
V.N.I.M. v. Canada
V.N.I.M. v. Canada CAT/C/29/D/119/1998 Communication number s : 119/1998 Author: V.N.I.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Canada Submission date 03 Nov 1998 Date of decision 12 Nov 2002 Comment: exact date of the admissibility JUTBCAT/C/29/D/119/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/176/en-US
V.R. and N.R v. Denmark,Iran (Islamic Republic of)
V.R. and N.R v. Denmark Iran Islamic Republic of CCPR/C/117/D/2745/2016 Communication number s : 2745/2016 Author: V.R. and N.R Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 117 Country Denmark Iran Islamic Republic of Submission date 27 Feb 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2745/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2244/en-US
V.R. v. Denmark
V.R. v. Denmark CAT/C/31/D/210/2002 Communication number s : 210/2002 Author: V.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Denmark Submission date 13 Feb 2002 Date of decision 17 Nov 2003 Comment: Pursuant to rule 104 of the Committee s JUTBCAT/C/31/D/210/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/158/en-US