Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
E.T.B. v. Denmark
E.T.B. v. Denmark CAT/C/28/D/146/1999 Communication number s : 146/1999 Author: E.T.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 28 Country Denmark Submission date 09 Aug 1999 Date of decision 30 Apr 2002 Comment: Pusuant to Rule 103 paragraph 1 c JUTBCAT/C/28/D/146/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/190/en-US
Gómez Vázquez v. Spain
G mez V zquez v. Spain CCPR/C/69/D/701/1996 Communication number s : 701/1996 Author: Cesario G mez V zquez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Spain Submission date 29 May 1995 Date of decision 20 Jul 2000 Comment: exact date of JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/701/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/880/en-US
Jaddoe v. Netherlands
Jaddoe v. Netherlands CCPR/C/135/D/3256/2018 Communication number s : 3256/2018 Author: Dewradj Jaddoe Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jun 2017 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3256/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3644/en-US
Román Jaimes v. Mexico
Rom n Jaimes v. Mexico CEDAW/C/83/D/153/2020 Communication number s : 153/2020 Author: Sandra Luz Rom n Jaimes Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Mexico Submission date 18 Oct 2019 Date of decision 24 Oct 2022 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/153/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3556/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US