Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 101 - 120 of 140
Picq v. France
Picq v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007 Communication number s : 1632/2007 Author: Raymond Jacques Picq Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country France Submission date 28 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1023/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
Polay Campos v. Peru
Polay Campos v. Peru CCPR/C/61/D/577/1994 Communication number s : 577/1994 Author: Rosa Espinoza de Polay Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Peru Submission date 05 Mar 1993 Date of decision 06 Nov 1997 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/61/D/577/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/371/en-US
Poma Poma v. Peru
Poma Poma v. Peru CCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006 Communication number s : 1457/2006 Author: ngela Poma Poma Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Peru Submission date 28 Dec 2004 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: In accordance with rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1495/en-US
Postnov v. Belarus
Postnov v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014 Communication number s : 2361/2014 Author: Igor Postnov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 22 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3108/en-US
R.G. v. Kyrgyzstan
R.G. v. Kyrgyzstan CEDAW/C/77/D/133/2018 Communication number s : 133/2018 Author: R.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 10 May 2018 Date of decision 03 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/77/D/133/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3130/en-US
R.S. v. Trinidad and Tobago
R.S. v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/684/1996 Communication number s : 684/1996 Author: R.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 13 Mar 1996 Date of decision 02 Apr 2002 Comment: The Committee JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/684/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/954/en-US
Rameka et al. v. New Zealand
Rameka et al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/79/D/1090/2002 Communication number s : 1090/2002 Author: Tai Wairiki Rameka et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country New Zealand Submission date 09 Mar 2002 Date of decision 06 Nov 2003 JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1090/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1090/en-US
Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales v. Mexico
Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales v. Mexico CEDAW/C/67/D/75/2014 Communication number s : 075/2014 Author: Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Mexico Submission date 01 JUTBCEDAW/C/67/D/75/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2249/en-US
Richard Sahlin v. Sweden
Richard Sahlin v. Sweden CRPD/C/23/D/45/2018 Communication number s : 45/2018 Author: Richard Sahlin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Sweden Submission date 23 Jan 2018 Date of decision 21 Aug 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/45/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3074/en-US
Rizvanović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Rizvanovi v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/110/D/1997/2010 Communication number s : 1997/2010 Author: Fatima Rizvanovi and Ruvejda Rizvanovi represented by counsel Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1997/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1814/en-US
Rosenberg and Jacquart v. France
Rosenberg and Jacquart v. France CCPR/C/130/D/2584/2015 Communication number s : 2584/2015 Author: Alain Rosenberg and Sabine Jacquart Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country France Submission date 15 Dec 2014 Date of decision 14 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2584/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3299/en-US
S.F.A. v. Denmark
S.F.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015 Communication number s : 085/2015 Author: S.F.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2427/en-US
S.F.A. v. Denmark
S.F.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015 Communication number s : 085/2015 Author: S.F.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 22 Apr 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2637/en-US
S.F.M. v. Spain
S.F.M. v. Spain CEDAW/C/75/D/138/2018 Communication number s : 138/2018 Author: S.F.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Spain Submission date Date of decision 28 Feb 2020 Comment: Obstetric violence Substantive issues: gender JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/138/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2710/en-US
S.J. v. Republic of Korea
S.J. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/127/D/2725/2016 Communication number s : 2725/2016 Author: S.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 20 Oct 2015 Date of decision 07 Nov 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2725/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2887/en-US
S.K. v. Finland
S.K. v. Finland CRPD/C/26/D/46/2018 Communication number s : 46/2018 Author: S.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Finland Submission date 07 Feb 2018 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/26/D/46/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3058/en-US
S.S. and P.S. v. Canada
S.S. and P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/62/D/702/2015 Communication number s : 702/2015 Author: S.S. and P.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Canada Submission date 04 Oct 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/702/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2402/en-US
S.T. v. Netherlands
S.T. v. Netherlands CAT/C/27/D/175/2000 Communication number s : 175/2000 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Netherlands Submission date 27 Nov 2000 Date of decision 23 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/27/D/175/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/188/en-US
Sefic v. Denmark
Sefic v. Denmark CERD/C/66/D/32/2003 Communication number s : 032/2003 Author: Emir Sefic Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Denmark Submission date 04 Aug 2003 Date of decision 07 Mar 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/66/D/32/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1738/en-US