Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 17 of 17
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Malta
A.S. et al. v. Malta CCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017 Communication number s : 3043/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Malta Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3300/en-US
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Coronel et al. v. Colombia
Coronel et al. v. Colombia CCPR/C/76/D/778/1997 Communication number s : 778/1997 Author: Jos Antonio Coronel et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Colombia Submission date 29 Sep 1996 Date of decision 24 Oct 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/778/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1032/en-US
Déogratias Niyonzima v. Burundi
D ogratias Niyonzima v. Burundi CAT/C/53/D/514/2012 Communication number s : 514/2012 Author: D ogratias Niyonzima represented by Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Burundi Submission date 23 Jul 2012 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/514/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2058/en-US
Durić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Duri v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/111/D/1956/2010 Communication number s : 1956/2010 Author: Nevzeta Duri and Nedzad Duri represented Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1956/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1848/en-US
F.J. et al. v. Australia
F.J. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013 Communication number s : 2233/2013 Author: F.J. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 03 Dec 2012 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3092/en-US
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
Georgopoulos, Georgopoulou and their seven children v. Greece
Georgopoulos Georgopoulou and their seven children v. Greece CCPR/C/99/D/1799/2008 Communication number s : 1799/2008 Author: Antonios Georgopoulos Chrysafo Georgopoulou and their seven children Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1799/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1629/en-US
Groupe d’Intérêt pour le Matronyme v. France
Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007 Communication number s : 012/2007 Author: Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 44 Country France Submission date 26 May 2006 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1709/en-US
K.E.R. v. Canada
K.E.R. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2196/2012 Communication number s : 2196/2012 Author: K.E.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2196/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2312/en-US
Lourdes da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil
Lourdes da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil CEDAW/C/49/D/17/2008 Communication number s : 017/2008 Author: Maria de Lourdes da Silva Pimentel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Brazil Submission date 30 Nov 2007 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCEDAW/C/49/D/17/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1701/en-US
Lula da Silva v. Brazil
Lula da Silva v. Brazil CCPR/C/134/D/2841/2016 INITIAL PROCEEDINGS Communication number s : 2841/2016 Author: Luiz In cio Lula da Silva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Brazil Submission date 28 Jul 2016 Date of decision 17 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2841/2016 (INITIAL PROCEEDINGS)https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3115/en-US
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012 Communication number s : 2136/2012 Author: M.M.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision Comment: The text of an individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1674/en-US
Munaf v. Iraq,Romania
Munaf v. Iraq Romania CCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006 Communication number s : 1539/2006 Author: Mohammad Munaf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Iraq Romania Submission date 13 Dec 2006 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1517/en-US
Tahar Ammari and Toufik Ammari v. Algeria
Tahar Ammari and Toufik Ammari v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2098/2011 Communication number s : 2098/2011 Author: Tahar Ammari represented by counsel Nassira Dutour of the Collectif des Famillesde Disparus en Alg rie Coalition of Families of Disappeared Persons JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2098/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1912/en-US
Z.B. v. Hungary
Z.B. v. Hungary CCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016 Communication number s : 2768/2016 Author: Z.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 123 Country Hungary Submission date 23 May 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2538/en-US