Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 20
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia CRPD/C/20/D/38/2016 Communication number s : 038/2016 Author: Al Adam Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Saudi Arabia Submission date 05 May 2016 Date of decision 20 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/38/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2513/en-US
Brun v. France
Brun v. France CCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006 Communication number s : 1453/2006 Author: Andr Brun Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country France Submission date 15 Nov 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1319/en-US
Dalisa Dovadzija and Sakiba Dovdzija v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Dalisa Dovadzija and Sakiba Dovdzija v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/114/D/2143/2012 Communication number s : 2143/2012 Author: TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 12 Mar 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2143/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2004/en-US
E.L.A. v. France
E.L.A. v. France CED/C/19/D/3/2019 Communication number s : 003/2019 Author: E.L.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 19 Online Country France Submission date 24 Sep 2018 Date of decision 25 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCED/C/19/D/3/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2755/en-US
Gemma Beasley v. Australia
Gemma Beasley v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/11/2013 Communication number s : 011/2013 Author: Gemma Beasley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 29 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/11/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2142/en-US
Haraldsson and Sveinsson v. Iceland
Haraldsson and Sveinsson v. Iceland CCPR/C/91/D/1306/2004 Communication number s : 1306/2004 Author: Erlingur Sveinn Haraldsson and rn Sn var Sveinsson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Iceland Submission date 15 Sep 2003 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1306/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1375/en-US
Koi v. Portugal
Koi v. Portugal CCPR/C/73/D/925/2000 Communication number s : 925/2000 Author: Wan Kuok Koi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Portugal Submission date 15 Dec 1999 Date of decision 22 Oct 2001 Comment: Five individual JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/925/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/950/en-US
Laaroussi v. Morocco
Laaroussi v. Morocco CAT/C/74/D/891/2018 Communication number s : 891/2018 Author: Abdel Jalil Laaroussi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Morocco Submission date 19 Oct 2018 Date of decision 15 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/74/D/891/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3615/en-US
M.H. v. Finland
M.H. v. Finland CRC/C/83/D/23/2017 Communication number s : 023/2017 Author: M.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Finland Submission date 29 Mar 2017 Date of decision 03 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/83/D/23/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2628/en-US
Michael Lockrey v. Australia
Michael Lockrey v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/13/2013 Communication number s : 013/2013 Author: Michael Lockrey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 08 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/13/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2143/en-US
Mikhailovskaya and Volchek v. Belarus
Mikhailovskaya and Volchek v. Belarus CCPR/C/111/D/1993/2010 Communication number s : 1993/2010 Author: Mikhailovskaya and Volchek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Belarus Submission date 27 May 2008 Date of decision 24 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1993/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1857/en-US
Natalia Ciobanu v. Republic of Moldova
Natalia Ciobanu v. Republic of Moldova CEDAW/C/74/D/104/2016 Communication number s : 104/2016 Author: Natalia Ciobanu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Republic of Moldova Submission date 03 May 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2019 JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/104/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2664/en-US
O.N., D.P. v. Russian Federation
O.N. D.P. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017 Communication number s : 119/2017 Author: O.N. D.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Russian Federation Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2709/en-US
Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales v. Mexico
Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales v. Mexico CEDAW/C/67/D/75/2014 Communication number s : 075/2014 Author: Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Mexico Submission date 01 JUTBCEDAW/C/67/D/75/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2249/en-US
Román Jaimes v. Mexico
Rom n Jaimes v. Mexico CEDAW/C/83/D/153/2020 Communication number s : 153/2020 Author: Sandra Luz Rom n Jaimes Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Mexico Submission date 18 Oct 2019 Date of decision 24 Oct 2022 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/153/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3556/en-US
Shafiq v. Australia
Shafiq v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1324/2004 Communication number s : 1324/2004 Author: Danyal Shafiq Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 05 Nov 2004 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1324/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1308/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Vladimir Schumilin v. Belarus
Vladimir Schumilin v. Belarus CCPR/C/105/D/1784/2008 Communication number s : 1784/2008 Author: Vladimir Schumilin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Mar 2005 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1784/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1469/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US