Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
E.H. et al. v. Belgium
E.H. et al. v. Belgium CRC/C/89/D/55/2018 Communication number s : 55/2018 Author: E.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Belgium Submission date 17 Sep 2018 Date of decision 03 Feb 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/89/D/55/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3002/en-US
J.D.P. and K.E.P. v. Sweden
J.D.P. and K.E.P. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2743/2016 Communication number s : 2743/2016 Author: J.D.P. and K.E.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2743/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2846/en-US
Madafferi v. Australia
Madafferi v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001 Communication number s : 1011/2001 Author: Francesco Madafferi and Anna Maria Immacolata Madafferi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2001 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1123/en-US
Thuraisamy v. Canada
Thuraisamy v. Canada CCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009 Communication number s : 1912/2009 Author: Ganesaratnam Thuraisamy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Canada Submission date 28 Oct 2009 Date of decision 31 Oct 2012 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1353/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US