Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 20
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
Alberto Velásquez Echeverri v. Colombia
Alberto Vel squez Echeverri v. Colombia CCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017 Communication number s : 2931/2017 Author: Alberto Vel squez Echeverri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Aug 2016 Date of decision 21 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2863/en-US
Dumont v. Canada
Dumont v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1467/2006 Communication number s : 1467/2006 Author: Michel Dumont Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 17 Mar 2006 Date of decision 16 Mar 2010 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1467/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1582/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Henley v. Australia
Henley v. Australia CRPD/C/27/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 56/2018 Author: Lauren Henley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Australia Submission date 03 Oct 2018 Date of decision 26 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/27/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3608/en-US
J.A.N.C. v. Colombia
J.A.N.C. v. Colombia CCPR/C/129/D/2922/2016 Communication number s : 2922/2016 Author: J.A.N.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Aug 2016 Date of decision 24 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2922/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2861/en-US
K.S. v. Poland
K.S. v. Poland CEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018 Communication number s : 128/2018 Author: K.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Poland Submission date 11 Apr 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3034/en-US
Kirill Nepomnyashchiy v. Russian Federation
Kirill Nepomnyashchiy v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/123/D/2318/2013 Communication number s : 2318/2013 Author: Kirill Nepomnyashchiy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Oct 2013 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2318/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2546/en-US
Liliane Gröninger et al. v. Germany
Liliane Gr ninger et al. v. Germany CRPD/C/D/2/2010 Communication number s : 002/2010 Author: Liliane Gr ninger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 11 Country Germany Submission date 25 Jun 2010 Date of decision 04 Apr 2014 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/D/2/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2005/en-US
M.S. v. Philippines
M.S. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/58/D/30/2011 Communication number s : 030/2011 Author: M.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Philippines Submission date 10 Feb 2011 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/30/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1879/en-US
Michael Lockrey v. Australia
Michael Lockrey v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/13/2013 Communication number s : 013/2013 Author: Michael Lockrey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 08 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/13/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2143/en-US
O.G. v. Russian Federation
O.G. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/68/D/91/2015 Communication number s : 091/2015 Author: O.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Russian Federation Submission date Date of decision 06 Nov 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/68/D/91/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2429/en-US
S.B. and M.B. v. North Macedonia
S.B. and M.B. v. North Macedonia CEDAW/C/77/D/143/2019 Communication number s : 143/2019 Author: S.B. and M.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country North Macedonia Submission date 16 May 2019 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/77/D/143/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3118/en-US
S.L. v. Bulgaria
S.L. v. Bulgaria CEDAW/C/73/D/99/2016 Communication number s : 099/2016 Author: S.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Bulgaria Submission date 23 Feb 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/99/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2657/en-US
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
Sabas Eduardo Pretelt de la Vega v. Colombia
Sabas Eduardo Pretelt de la Vega v. Colombia CCPR/C/129/D/2930/2017 Communication number s : 2930/2017 Author: Sabas Eduardo Pretelt de la Vega Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Aug 2016 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2930/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2862/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
V.P. v. Belarus
V.P. v. Belarus CEDAW/C/79/D/131/2018 Communication number s : 131/2018 Author: V.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Belarus Submission date 20 Nov 2017 Date of decision 28 Jun 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/79/D/131/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3042/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US