Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 881 - 900 of 1045
T v. New Zealand
T v. New Zealand CCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015 Communication number s : 2684/2015 Author: T Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3316/en-US
Tadman et al. v. Canada
Tadman et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/67/D/816/1998 Communication number s : 816/1998 Author: Grant Tadman et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 11 Apr 1997 Date of decision 29 Oct 1999 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/816/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/835/en-US
Taito Fa’afete v. New Zealand
Taito Fa afete v. New Zealand CCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009 Communication number s : 1909/2009 Author: Tony Ellis counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country New Zealand Submission date 12 May 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1983/en-US
Taoufik Elaïba v. Tunisia
Taoufik Ela ba v. Tunisia CAT/C/57/D/551/2013 Communication number s : 551/2013 Author: Taoufik Ela ba Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Tunisia Submission date 11 Jun 2013 Date of decision 06 May 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/57/D/551/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2118/en-US
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines CEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008 Communication number s : 018/2008 Author: Karen Tayag Vertido Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Philippines Submission date 29 Nov 2007 Date of decision 16 Jul 2010 Comment: The JUTBCEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1700/en-US
Terrón v. Spain
Terr n v. Spain CCPR/C/82/D/1073/2002 Communication number s : 1073/2002 Author: Jes s Terr n Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Spain Submission date 13 Feb 2001 Date of decision 05 Nov 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/1073/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/976/en-US
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia CAT/C/72/D/944/2019 Communication number s : 944/2019 Author: Niroshanth Tharchanamoorthy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/944/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3341/en-US
Tharu et al. v. Nepal
Tharu et al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011 Communication number s : 2038/2011 Author: Chhedulal Tharu Sara/Sarita Tharu Padam Tharu Sanchariya Tharu Birbal Tharu Thagani Tharu Bhagawati Tharu Tulsiram Tharu Phagani Tharu Mahango Tharu Parmeshwari Tharu JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1994/en-US
Tharu et al. v. Nepal
Tharu et al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011 Communication number s : 2038/2011 Author: Chhedulal Tharu Sara/Sarita Tharu Padam Tharu Sanchariya Tharu Birbal Tharu Thagani Tharu Bhagawati Tharu Tulsiram Tharu Phagani Tharu Mahango Tharu Parmeshwari Tharu JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2027/en-US
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway CERD/C/67/D/30/2003 Communication number s : 030/2003 Author: The Jewish community of Oslo the Jewish community of Trondheim Rolf Kirchner Julius Paltiel the Norwegian Antiracist Centre and Nadeem Butt Type of JUTBCERD/C/67/D/30/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1740/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Tholal and Mahmood v. Maldives
Tholal and Mahmood v. Maldives CCPR/C/130/D/3248/2018 Communication number s : 3248/2018 Author: Ahmed Tholal and Jeehan Mahmood Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Maldives Submission date 25 Sep 2016 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3248/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3276/en-US
Thomas James Hickey v. Australia
Thomas James Hickey v. Australia CCPR/C/111/D/1995/2010 Communication number s : 1995/2010 Author: Elizabeth Gail Hickey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Australia Submission date 14 Feb 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1995/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1858/en-US
Thuraisamy v. Canada
Thuraisamy v. Canada CCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009 Communication number s : 1912/2009 Author: Ganesaratnam Thuraisamy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Canada Submission date 28 Oct 2009 Date of decision 31 Oct 2012 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1353/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 119 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2435/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 01 Nov 2018 Comment: Note: JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2563/en-US
Tija Hero, Ermina Hero, Armin Hero v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Tija Hero Ermina Hero Armin Hero v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/112/D/1966/2010 Communication number s : 1966/2010 Author: Tija Hero Ermina Hero Armin Hero represented by counsel Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1966/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1889/en-US
Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel v. Nepal
Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel v. Nepal CCPR/C/126/D/2560/2015 Communication number s : 2560/2015 Author: Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Nepal Submission date 11 Apr 2014 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2560/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2721/en-US
Tikhonov v. Kazakhstan
Tikhonov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2551/2015 Communication number s : 2551/2015 Author: Dmitriy Vladimirovich Tikhonov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2551/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3272/en-US
Timur Ilyasov v. Kazakhstan
Timur Ilyasov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/111/D/2009/2010 Communication number s : 2009/2010 Author: Timur Ilyasov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 21 Jul 2010 Date of decision 23 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2009/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1861/en-US