Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Ernazarov v. Kyrgyzstan v. Kyrgyzstan
Ernazarov v. Kyrgyzstan v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/113/D/2054/2011 Communication number s : 2054/2011 Author: Mamatkarim Ernazarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 11 Mar 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2054/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1961/en-US
Grioua v. Algeria
Grioua v. Algeria CCPR/C/90/D/1327/2004 Communication number s : 1327/2004 Author: Messaouda Grioua n e Atamna Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Oct 2004 Date of decision 10 Jul 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1327/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1367/en-US
H.E.A.K. v. Denmark
H.E.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2343/2014 Communication number s : 2343/2014 Author: H.E.A.K. represented by counsel Anna Akuo Bakmand Bernthsen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Jan 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2343/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1953/en-US
Idieva v. Tajikistan
Idieva v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/95/D/1276/2004 Communication number s : 1276/2004 Author: Zulfia Idieva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Tajikistan Submission date 13 Apr 2004 Date of decision 31 Mar 2009 Comment: Under rule 92 of JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1276/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1502/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US