Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 401 - 420 of 491
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T.Z. v. Switzerland
T.Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/688/2015 Communication number s : 688/2015 Author: T.Z. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 07 Jul 2015 Date of decision 22 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/688/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2334/en-US
Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband, Boris Shikhmuradov v. Turkmenistan
Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband Boris Shikhmuradov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/112/D/2069/2011 Communication number s : 2069/2011 Author: Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband Boris Shikhmuradov not represented by counsel Type of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2069/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1907/en-US
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia CAT/C/72/D/944/2019 Communication number s : 944/2019 Author: Niroshanth Tharchanamoorthy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/944/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3341/en-US
Tharu and Kumari Tharuni v. Nepal
Tharu and Kumari Tharuni v. Nepal CCPR/C/134/D/3199/2018 Communication number s : 3199/2018 Author: Puniram Tharu and Nira Kumari Tharuni Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Nepal Submission date 28 Mar 2018 Date of decision 14 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3199/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3080/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Thuraisamy v. Canada
Thuraisamy v. Canada CCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009 Communication number s : 1912/2009 Author: Ganesaratnam Thuraisamy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Canada Submission date 28 Oct 2009 Date of decision 31 Oct 2012 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1353/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 119 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2435/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 01 Nov 2018 Comment: Note: JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2563/en-US
Tija Hero, Ermina Hero, Armin Hero v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Tija Hero Ermina Hero Armin Hero v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/112/D/1966/2010 Communication number s : 1966/2010 Author: Tija Hero Ermina Hero Armin Hero represented by counsel Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1966/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1889/en-US
Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel v. Nepal
Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel v. Nepal CCPR/C/126/D/2560/2015 Communication number s : 2560/2015 Author: Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Nepal Submission date 11 Apr 2014 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2560/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2721/en-US
Tony Chahin v. Sweden
Tony Chahin v. Sweden CAT/C/46/D/310/2007 Communication number s : 310/2007 Author: Tony Chahin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Sweden Submission date 20 Dec 2006 Date of decision 30 May 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/46/D/310/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1789/en-US
Tursunov v. Kazakhstan,Uzbekistan
Tursunov v. Kazakhstan Uzbekistan CAT/C/54/D/538/2013 Communication number s : 538/2013 Author: Khairullo Tursunov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Kazakhstan Uzbekistan Submission date 14 Feb 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 JUTBCAT/C/54/D/538/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1949/en-US
U.G. v. Belgium
U.G. v. Belgium CRC/C/85/D/34/2017 Communication number s : 034/2017 Author: U.G. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Belgium Submission date 24 Jun 2017 Date of decision 28 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/85/D/34/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2754/en-US
U.S. v. Finland
U.S. v. Finland CAT/C/30/D/197/2002 Communication number s : 197/2002 Author: U.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Finland Submission date 07 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/197/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/168/en-US
U. v. Sweden
U. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/643/2014 Communication number s : 643/2014 Author: U. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 05 Dec 2014 Date of decision 23 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/56/D/643/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2077/en-US
Ulyana Zakharenko and Elena Zakharenko v. Belarus
Ulyana Zakharenko and Elena Zakharenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/119/D/2586/2015 Communication number s : 2586/2015 Author: Ulyana Zakharenko and Elena Zakharenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Mar 2014 Date JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2586/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2290/en-US
Uttam Mondal v. Sweden
Uttam Mondal v. Sweden CAT/C/46/D/338/2008 Communication number s : 338/2008 Author: Uttam Mondal Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Sweden Submission date 30 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 May 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/46/D/338/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/52/en-US
V.C. (deceased) v. Republic of Moldova
V.C. deceased v. Republic of Moldova CEDAW/C/76/D/105/2016 Communication number s : 105/2016 Author: Promo LEX Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Republic of Moldova Submission date 20 Jul 2016 Date of decision 09 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/105/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3041/en-US
V.D.A. v. Argentina
V.D.A. v. Argentina CCPR/C/101/D/1608/2007 Communication number s : 1608/2007 Author: V.D.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Argentina Submission date 25 May 2007 Date of decision 29 Mar 2011 Comment: In accordance with article JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1608/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1611/en-US