Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 341 - 360 of 473
P.V. v. Australia
P.V. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/708/2015 Communication number s : 708/2015 Author: P.V. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 20 Oct 2015 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/708/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3427/en-US
Pérez Guartambel v. Ecuador
P rez Guartambel v. Ecuador CERD/C/100/D/61/2017 Communication number s : 61/2017 Author: Yaku P rez Guartambel Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 100 Country Ecuador Submission date 10 Feb 2017 Date of decision 04 Dec 2019 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/100/D/61/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3445/en-US
POEM and FASM v. Denmark
POEM and FASM v. Denmark CERD/C/62/D/22/2002 Communication number s : 022/2002 Author: POEM and FASM Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 08 Aug 2001 Date of decision 19 Mar 2003 Comment: This document JUTBCERD/C/62/D/22/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1758/en-US
Park v. Republic of Korea
Park v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/64/D/628/1995 Communication number s : 628/1995 Author: Tae Hoon Park Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 11 Aug 1994 Date of decision 20 Oct 1998 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/64/D/628/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/810/en-US
Parun and Bulmer v. New Zealand
Parun and Bulmer v. New Zealand CCPR/C/71/D/952/2000 Communication number s : 952/2000 Author: M. J. Parun and K. D. Bulmer Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country New Zealand Submission date 15 Oct 1998 Date of decision 22 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/71/D/952/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/918/en-US
Paul Zentveld v. New Zealand
Paul Zentveld v. New Zealand CAT/C/68/D/852/2017 Communication number s : 852/2017 Author: Paul Zentveld represented by counsel Victor Boyd from the Citizens Commission on Human Rights New Zealand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country JUTBCAT/C/68/D/852/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2697/en-US
Pestaño v. Philippines
Pesta o v. Philippines CCPR/C/98/D/1619/2007 Communication number s : 1619/2007 Author: Felipe and Evelyn Pesta o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Philippines Submission date 24 Apr 2007 Date of decision 23 Mar 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1619/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1564/en-US
Pezoldova v. Czech Republic
Pezoldova v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/76/D/757/1997 Communication number s : 757/1997 Author: Alzbeta Pezoldova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Czech Republic Submission date 30 Sep 1996 Date of decision 25 Oct 2002 Comment: Two JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/757/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1025/en-US
Polish Society of Anti-Discrimination Law v. Poland
Polish Society of Anti Discrimination Law v. Poland CEDAW/C/73/D/136/2018 Communication number s : 136/2018 Author: Polish Society of Anti Discrimination Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Poland Submission date 13 Sep JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/136/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2660/en-US
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Q. v. Denmark v. Denmark
Q. v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/113/D/2001/2010 Communication number s : 2001/2010 Author: Q. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Jul 2010 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2001/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1923/en-US
R.H.M. v. Denmark
R.H.M. v. Denmark CRC/C/86/D/83/2019 Communication number s : 83/2019 Author: R.H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Apr 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of Committee JUTBCRC/C/86/D/83/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3565/en-US
R.H. v. Sweden
R.H. v. Sweden CAT/C/63/D/750/2016 Communication number s : 750/2016 Author: R.H. represented by counsels Mathias Blomberg and Beatrice Rohdin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Sweden Submission date 19 May 2016 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/63/D/750/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2732/en-US
R.I. v. Ecuador
R.I. v. Ecuador CRPD/C/22/D/25/2014 Communication number s : 25/2014 Author: R.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 22 Country Ecuador Submission date 18 Aug 2014 Date of decision 06 Sep 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/25/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3132/en-US
R.L.M. v. France
R.L.M. v. France CCPR/C/44/D/363/1989 Communication number s : 363/1989 Author: R.L.M. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 44 Country France Submission date 11 May 1989 Date of decision 06 Apr 1992 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/44/D/363/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/541/en-US
R.L. et al. (Whispering Pines Band) v. Canada
R.L. et al. Whispering Pines Band v. Canada CCPR/C/43/D/358/1989 Communication number s : 358/1989 Author: R.L. M.B. M.H. names deleted and 14 other members of the Whispering Pines Band Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/358/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/638/en-US
R.M. and F.M. v. Denmark
R.M. and F.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2685/2015 Communication number s : 2685/2015 Author: R.M. and F.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Nov 2015 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2685/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2792/en-US
R.P.B. v. Philippines
R.P.B. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011 Communication number s : 034/2011 Author: R.P.B. represented by counsel Evalyn G. Ursua and Maria Karla L. Espinosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Philippines Submission date 23 May JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1875/en-US
R.R., M.R. v. Finland
R.R. M.R. v. Finland CEDAW/C/75/D/111/2017 Communication number s : 111/2017 Author: R.R. M.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Finland Submission date Date of decision 17 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/111/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2706/en-US
Rahaman v. Canada
Rahaman v. Canada CCPR/C/132/D/2810/2016 Communication number s : 2810/2016 Author: Mozibor Rahaman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Canada Submission date 13 Sep 2016 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2810/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3198/en-US