Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 141 - 160 of 162
Shpagina v. Russian Federation
Shpagina v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/84/D/129/2018 Communication number s : 129/2018 Author: Oksana Shpagina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Russian Federation Submission date 25 Mar 2018 Date of decision 23 Feb 2023 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/129/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3749/en-US
Simón Mora Carrero et al. v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Sim n Mora Carrero et al. v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/128/D/3018/2017 Communication number s : 3018/2017 Author: Sim n Mora Carrero and Alcedo Guaicamacuto Mora Carrero on their own behalf and on behalf of their missing father Alcedo Mora M JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3018/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2821/en-US
Stewart v. Canada
Stewart v. Canada CCPR/C/58/D/538/1993 Communication number s : 538/1993 Author: Charles E. Stewart Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Canada Submission date 18 Feb 1993 Date of decision 01 Nov 1996 Comment: Five individual JUTBCCPR/C/58/D/538/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/551/en-US
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines CEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008 Communication number s : 018/2008 Author: Karen Tayag Vertido Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Philippines Submission date 29 Nov 2007 Date of decision 16 Jul 2010 Comment: The JUTBCEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1700/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel v. Nepal
Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel v. Nepal CCPR/C/126/D/2560/2015 Communication number s : 2560/2015 Author: Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Nepal Submission date 11 Apr 2014 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2560/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2721/en-US
Tillman v. Australia
Tillman v. Australia CCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007 Communication number s : 1635/2007 Author: Kenneth Davidson Tillman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Australia Submission date 09 Oct 2007 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1576/en-US
Toonen v. Australia
Toonen v. Australia CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 Communication number s : 488/1992 Author: Nicholas Toonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision 31 Mar 1994 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/488/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/702/en-US
Umarova v. Uzbekistan
Umarova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/100/D/1449/2006 Communication number s : 1449/2006 Author: Indira Umarova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 20 Jan 2006 Date of decision 19 Oct 2010 Comment: On 18 April JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1449/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1588/en-US
V.A. v. Switzerland
V.A. v. Switzerland CRC/C/85/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 056/2018 Author: V.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Online limited session Country Switzerland Submission date 27 Sep 2018 Date of decision 28 Sep 2020 Comment: This JUTBCRC/C/85/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2762/en-US
V.K. v. Bulgaria
V.K. v. Bulgaria CEDAW/C/49/D/20/2008 Communication number s : 020/2008 Author: Ms. V.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Bulgaria Submission date 15 Oct 2008 Date of decision 25 Jul 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/49/D/20/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1702/en-US
V.P. v. Belarus
V.P. v. Belarus CEDAW/C/79/D/131/2018 Communication number s : 131/2018 Author: V.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Belarus Submission date 20 Nov 2017 Date of decision 28 Jun 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/79/D/131/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3042/en-US
V.S. v. Slovakia
V.S. v. Slovakia CERD/C/88/D/56/2014 Communication number s : 056/2014 Author: V.S. represented by counsel Vanda Durbakova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Slovakia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 04 Dec 2015 JUTBCERD/C/88/D/56/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2091/en-US
Vitaly Symonik v. Belarus
Vitaly Symonik v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/1952/2010 Communication number s : 1952/2010 Author: Vitaly Symonik represented by counsel Roman Kisliak Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 26 Dec 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1952/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1887/en-US
Winata and Li v. Australia
Winata and Li v. Australia CCPR/C/72/D/930/2000 Communication number s : 930/2000 Author: Hendrick Winata and So Lan Li Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 26 Jul 2001 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/930/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/929/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US