Search

Data source

• (-) jutb (2)

EU member states

• austria (2)
• bulgaria (2)
• denmark (1)
• finland (1)
• spain (1)

Other countries

• Kazakhstan (1)
• Moldova (1)
• Philippines (1)
• Réunion (1)
• Russian Federation (1)
• Tanzania (1)
• Turkey (1)
• United Kingdom (1)

Keywords

• 1992 (2)
• 2010 (2)
• 2011 (2)
• 2012 (2)
• 2013 (2)
• 2014 (2)
• 2015 (2)
• 2016 (2)
• 2017 (2)
• 2019 (2)
• abolish (2)
• abusive (2)
• accordance (2)
• account (2)
• accused (2)
• action (2)
• actions (2)
• actors (2)
• acts (2)
• addition (2)
• address (2)
• adds (2)
• adequate (2)
• administrative (2)
• admissibility (2)
• adopt (2)
• adopted (2)
• adoption (2)
• advice (2)
• affect (2)
• affected (2)
• affects (2)
• aimed (2)
• alleged (2)
• allowed (2)
• ambulance (2)
• apartment (2)
• application (2)
• applied (2)
• apply (2)
• approach (2)
• april (2)
• arabic (2)
• argument (2)
• arguments (2)
• articles (2)
• assault (2)
• assaulted (2)
• assertion (2)
• asserts (2)
• assessed (2)
• assessment (2)
• attempted (2)
• attributed (2)
• august (2)
• authorities (2)
• avoid (2)
• aware (2)
• background (2)
• bailiffs (2)
• based (2)
• basis (2)
• behalf (2)
• behaviour (2)
• born (2)
• breach (2)
• bring (2)
• brought (2)
• called (2)
• care (2)
• careful (2)

Tags

• (-) gender-based violence (2)
• discrimination on the ground of sex (2)
• effective remedy (1)
• equality before the law (1)

Search

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

J.I. v. Finland

J.I. v. Finland CEDAW/C/69/D/103/2016 Communication number s : 103/2016 Author: J.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Finland Submission date Date of decision 05 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/103/2016

https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2432/en-US

S.T. v. Russian Federation

S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014

https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US