Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 141 - 160 of 169
Sogi v. Canada,India
Sogi v. Canada India CAT/C/39/D/297/2006 Communication number s : 297/2006 Author: Bachan Singh Sogi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Canada India Submission date 11 Jun 2006 Date of decision 16 Nov 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/39/D/297/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/85/en-US
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia CCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007 Communication number s : 1557/2007 Author: Stefan Lars Nystrom represented by the Human Rights Law Resource Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Australia Submission JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1211/en-US
Surat Huseynov v. Azerbaijan
Surat Huseynov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/111/D/2042/2011 Communication number s : 2042/2011 Author: Surat Davud Oglu Huseynov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 111 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 05 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2042/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1865/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
Taito Fa’afete v. New Zealand
Taito Fa afete v. New Zealand CCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009 Communication number s : 1909/2009 Author: Tony Ellis counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country New Zealand Submission date 12 May 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1983/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Tholal and Mahmood v. Maldives
Tholal and Mahmood v. Maldives CCPR/C/130/D/3248/2018 Communication number s : 3248/2018 Author: Ahmed Tholal and Jeehan Mahmood Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Maldives Submission date 25 Sep 2016 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3248/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3276/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 119 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2435/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 01 Nov 2018 Comment: Note: JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2563/en-US
Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel v. Nepal
Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel v. Nepal CCPR/C/126/D/2560/2015 Communication number s : 2560/2015 Author: Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Nepal Submission date 11 Apr 2014 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2560/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2721/en-US
Toonen v. Australia
Toonen v. Australia CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 Communication number s : 488/1992 Author: Nicholas Toonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision 31 Mar 1994 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/488/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/702/en-US
U.M.H. v. Sweden
U.M.H. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2742/2016 Communication number s : 2742/2016 Author: U.M.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2742/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2845/en-US
Umarova v. Uzbekistan
Umarova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/100/D/1449/2006 Communication number s : 1449/2006 Author: Indira Umarova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 20 Jan 2006 Date of decision 19 Oct 2010 Comment: On 18 April JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1449/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1588/en-US
Valery Rybchenko v. Belarus
Valery Rybchenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/124/D/2266/2013 Communication number s : 2266/2013 Author: Valery Rybchenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Mar 2013 Date of decision 17 Oct 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2266/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2552/en-US
Vargay v. Canada
Vargay v. Canada CCPR/C/96/D/1639/2007 Communication number s : 1639/2007 Author: Peter Zsolt Vargay Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 96 Country Canada Submission date 09 Oct 2007 Date of decision 28 Jul 2009 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1639/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1520/en-US
Venier and Nicolas v. France
Venier and Nicolas v. France CCPR/C/69/D/690/1996 Communication number s : 691/1996 690/1996 Author: Marc Venier and Paul Nicolas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country France Submission date 14 Nov 1995 Date of decision 10 Jul 2000 JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/690/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/885/en-US
Vlcek v. Czech Republic
Vlcek v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/93/D/1485/2006 Communication number s : 1485/2006 Author: Zdenek Vlcek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Czech Republic Submission date 21 Mar 2006 Date of decision 10 Jul 2008 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1485/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1422/en-US
W.E.O. v. Sweden
W.E.O. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016 Communication number s : 2741/2016 Author: W.E.O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2844/en-US
Wallmann et al. v. Austria
Wallmann et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/80/D/1002/2001 Communication number s : 1002/2001 Author: Franz Wallmann Rusella Wallmann Hotel zum Hirschen Josef Wallmann Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Austria Submission date 02 Feb 2001 JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1002/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1101/en-US