Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
A.H.S. v. Denmark
A.H.S. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2473/2014 Communication number s : 2473/2014 Author: A.H.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 24 Oct 2014 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2473/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2189/en-US
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Fardon v. Australia
Fardon v. Australia CCPR/C/98/D/1629/2007 Communication number s : 1629/2007 Author: Robert John Fardon Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Australia Submission date 01 Mar 2006 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: An individual JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1629/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1574/en-US
Franck Kitenge Baruani v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Franck Kitenge Baruani v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/110/D/1890/2009 Communication number s : 1890/2009 Author: Franck Kitenge Baruani represented by Anna Copeland SCALES Community Legal Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1890/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1804/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014 Communication number s : 2366/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 19 Mar 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2017/en-US