Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9
Alger v. Australia
Alger v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013 Communication number s : 2237/2013 Author: Christopher Alger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2315/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013 Communication number s : 2273/2013 Author: Andrea Vandom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 07 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2496/en-US
Dhakal et.al. v. Nepal
Dhakal et.al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2185/2012 Communication number s : 2185/2012 Author: Bimala Dhakal Rabindra Dhakal and Manjima Dhakal Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Jan 2012 Date of decision 17 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2185/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2265/en-US
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/536/2013 Communication number s : 536/2013 Author: H.B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 14 Nov 2012 Date of decision 02 Dec 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/536/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2070/en-US
H.K v. Australia
H.K v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/701/2015 Communication number s : 701/2015 Author: H.K Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60th session Country Australia Submission date 16 Sep 2015 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: Views violation. JUTBCAT/C/60/D/701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2327/en-US
M.R.M.A. v. Australia
M.R.M.A. v. Australia CAT/C/66/D/749/2016 Communication number s : 749/2016 Author: M.R.M.A. represented by counsel John Phillip Sweeney Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 66 Country Australia Submission date 22 Apr 2016 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/66/D/749/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2574/en-US
S. J. D. v. Australia
S. J. D. v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/387/2009 Communication number s : 387/2009 Author: S. J. D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2009 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/51/D/387/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2099/en-US
Vasily Poliakov v. Belarus
Vasily Poliakov v. Belarus CCPR/C/111/D/2103/2011 Communication number s : 2103/2011 Author: Vasily Poliakov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Belarus Submission date 10 Sep 2011 Date of decision 17 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2103/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1870/en-US