Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
D and E v. Australia
D and E v. Australia CCPR/C/87/D/1050/2002 Communication number s : 1050/2002 Author: D and E and their two children Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Australia Submission date 01 Feb 2002 Date of decision 11 Jul 2006 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1050/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1275/en-US
J.K. et al. v. Republic of Korea
J.K. et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/128/D/2939/2017 Communication number s : 2939/2017 Author: J.K. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 19 Jan 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2939/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2836/en-US
M.Z.B.M. v. Denmark
M.Z.B.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2593/2015 Communication number s : 2593/2015 Author: M.Z.B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 31 Mar 2015 Date of decision 20 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2593/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2240/en-US
N.M. v.
N.M. v. CEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015 Communication number s : 092/2015 Author: N.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Submission date 04 Jun 2015 Date of decision 09 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2642/en-US
N.M. v. Türkiye
N.M. v. T rkiye CEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015 Communication number s : 092/2015 Author: N.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country T rkiye Submission date Date of decision 09 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2430/en-US
Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar v. Australia
Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/614/2014 Communication number s : 614/2014 Author: Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar represented by counsel Robert James de Vere McCaw Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/614/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2254/en-US