Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 835
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
AUSTRIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/AUT/CO/4 NULL 2013 12 12T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/AUT/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 13 December 2013 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/AUT/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c8f9707a-74dc-4bbe-8efb-c0632eec37d7
AUSTRIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/AUT/CO/5 6 NULL 2020 03 05T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/AUT/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 6 March 2020 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/AUT/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/fb9ac4c5-e347-47aa-845e-8c7dc6c54e2e
Abdelli v. Tunisia
Abdelli v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/188/2001 Communication number s : 188/2001 Author: Imed Abdelli Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 29 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/188/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/167/en-US
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 099)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ETS No. 099 099 Strasbourg 1978 03 17T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 30 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 099https://rm.coe.int/1680077975
Ali Aarrass v. Spain
Ali Aarrass v. Spain CCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010 Communication number s : 2008/2010 Author: Ali Aarrass Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Spain Submission date 25 Nov 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1860/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
B.L. (represented by Balmain for Refugees) v. Australia
B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011 Communication number s : 2053/2011 Author: B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1905/en-US
Ben Salem v. Tunisia
Ben Salem v. Tunisia CAT/C/39/D/269/2005 Communication number s : 269/2005 Author: Ali Ben Salem Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 May 2005 Date of decision 07 Nov 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/39/D/269/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/87/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA 53891/20 DOBREVA N. BGR 5/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523JUD005389120https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-224778
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348
CASE OF A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS 29094/09 TER MEULEN MOUWEN E. NLD 7/5/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD002909409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164460
CASE OF AGDAS v. TURKEY
CASE OF AGDAS v. TURKEY 34592/97 N/A TUR 7/27/2004 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 2 with regard to death Violation of Art. 2 with regard to lack of effective investigation Not necessary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0727JUD003459297https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61941
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK 45439/18 JENSEN T. DNK 9/15/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 350 90 193 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD004543918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-204602
CASE OF AHRENS v. GERMANY
CASE OF AHRENS v. GERMANY 45071/09 RIXE G. DEU 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life No violation of Article 14 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD004507109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109815
CASE OF AKSOY v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKSOY v. TURKEY 21987/93 N/A TUR 12/18/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 25 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1218JUD002198793https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58003