Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 447
16. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 16. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance New York 20 December 2006 Entry into force : 23 December 2010 in accordance with article 39 1 which UNIV-16https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-16&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
A.T. v. Austria
A.T. v. Austria AUT 21/06/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a public oral hearing in compensation proceedings for defamation under the Media Act. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-847
ACHLEITNER v. Austria
ACHLEITNER v. Austria AUT 23/01/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings on civil rights and obligations and criminal charges before administrative authorities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-955
ALGE v. Austria
ALGE v. Austria AUT 22/04/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations or the determination of criminal charges before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-909
AVISO ZETA AG v. Austria
AVISO ZETA AG v. Austria AUT 21/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the lack of impartiality of the Supreme Court as its composition had failed to meet the Convention standard EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49791
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
BAISCHER v. Austria
BAISCHER v. Austria AUT 20/03/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair administrative criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing before an Independent Administrative Panel for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-845
BARTENBACH v. Austria
BARTENBACH v. Austria AUT 20/06/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Length and unfairness of criminal administrative proceedings for illegally employing a foreign citizen breach of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-549
BEER MARIE-LUISE v. Austria
BEER MARIE LUISE v. Austria AUT 18/05/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings on account of the absence of a public hearing in proceedings before the authorities competent for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-685
BEER v. Austria
BEER v. Austria AUT 06/02/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms in that the applicant had not been informed of an appeal brought by her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-833
BENES v. Austria
BENES v. Austria AUT 17/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of respective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45997
BETTINA MALEK v. Austria
BETTINA MALEK v. Austria AUT 21/01/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings before administrative courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1039
BIEGLER BAUGESMBH (LP) v. Austria
BIEGLER BAUGESMBH LP v. Austria AUT 11/07/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-849
C.H. v. Austria
C.H. v. Austria AUT 03/01/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence due to the refusal of the applicant s claim for compensation in respect of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-811
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403