Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 4146
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Anderson v. Australia
Anderson v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005 Communication number s : 1367/2005 Author: Tim Anderson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 26 Jul 2004 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1306/en-US
Angela González Carreño v. Spain
Angela Gonz lez Carre o v. Spain CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 Communication number s : 047/2012 Author: Angela Gonz lez Carre o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Spain Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1878/en-US
Austria: Anti-Racism commission praises initiatives to promote integration and counter discrimination, but challenges remain
Austria: Anti Racism commission praises initiatives to promote integration and counter discrimination but challenges remain AUT 2020 06 02 Sixth report on Austria en fr deu Austria: Anti Racism commission praises initiatives to promote integration and ECRIAUT-PR-VI-2020-318-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-PR-VI-2020-318-ENG
Austria’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
German Deutsch GENEVA 19 January 2021 Austria s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Friday 22 January 2021 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Austria UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/01/austrias-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Avadanov v. Azerbaijan
Avadanov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007 Communication number s : 1633/2007 Author: Khilal Avadanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 31 Jul 2007 Date of decision 25 Oct 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1591/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
B.L. (represented by Balmain for Refugees) v. Australia
B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011 Communication number s : 2053/2011 Author: B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1905/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
Béatrice Marin v. France
B atrice Marin v. France CCPR/C/99/D/1793/2008 Communication number s : 1793/2008 Author: B atrice Marin Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 99 Country France Submission date 05 May 2008 Date of decision 27 Jul 2010 Comment: The texts of JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1793/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1575/en-US
BAISCHER v. Austria
BAISCHER v. Austria AUT 20/03/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair administrative criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing before an Independent Administrative Panel for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-845
BARTENBACH v. Austria
BARTENBACH v. Austria AUT 20/06/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Length and unfairness of criminal administrative proceedings for illegally employing a foreign citizen breach of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-549
BEER MARIE-LUISE v. Austria
BEER MARIE LUISE v. Austria AUT 18/05/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings on account of the absence of a public hearing in proceedings before the authorities competent for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-685
BEER v. Austria
BEER v. Austria AUT 06/02/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms in that the applicant had not been informed of an appeal brought by her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-833
BENES v. Austria
BENES v. Austria AUT 17/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of respective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45997
BETTINA MALEK v. Austria
BETTINA MALEK v. Austria AUT 21/01/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings before administrative courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1039
BIEGLER BAUGESMBH (LP) v. Austria
BIEGLER BAUGESMBH LP v. Austria AUT 11/07/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-849
BUCHBERGER v. Austria
BUCHBERGER v. Austria AUT 20/03/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Transfer of custody of the applicant s sons to the Youth Welfare Office without sufficiently involving her in the decision making process. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-853
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US