Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 624
3. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 3. International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 3 January 1976 in accordance with article 27. 1 Registration : 3 January 1976 No. UNIV-3https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-3&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
A/HRC/47/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Lebanon
United Nations A/HRC/47/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc475-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-lebanon
ANAKOMBA YULA v. Belgium
ANAKOMBA YULA v. Belgium BEL 10/06/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Discrimination/Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal by the domestic courts to grant legal aid in proceedings in which a mother contested her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1533
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BEUZE v. Belgium
BEUZE v. Belgium BEL 09/11/2018 00:00:00 16/11/2018 14:46:27 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings as a whole due to the fact that procedural defects which had occurred at pre trial stage EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50769
BRICHET AND BOUZET v. Belgium
BRICHET AND BOUZET v. Belgium BEL 24/07/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings in which the applicants acted as civil parties. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1403
C.M. v. Belgium
C.M. v. Belgium BEL 13/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to enforce judicial decisions ordering the applicant s neighbour to carry out rehabilitation work in order to comply with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49765
CAPEAU v. Belgium
CAPEAU v. Belgium BEL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence on account of the Ministry of Justice s refusal upheld by the Appeals Board to grant a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1399
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF AŽDAJIĆ v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF A DAJI v. SLOVENIA 71872/12 MARCIC B. SVN 10/8/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing 445 40 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD007187212 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A DAJI v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD007187212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157537
CASE OF A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS
CASE OF A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS 41903/10 41911/10 CHARALAMBIDOU N. CYP 7/21/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD004190310https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156264
CASE OF A.-M.V. v. FINLAND
CASE OF A. M.V. v. FINLAND 53251/13 SILLANPAA H. FIN 3/23/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0323JUD005325113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172134
CASE OF A.T. v. LUXEMBOURG
CASE OF A.T. v. LUXEMBOURG 30460/13 SCHONS R. ENTRINGER B. LUX 4/9/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 6 3 c Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Article 6 3 c Defence through legal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0409JUD003046013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-153960
CASE OF ADŽIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF AD I v. CROATIA 22643/14 BOJIC I. HRV 3/12/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD002264314 FIRST ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD002264314https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-152731
CASE OF ADEN AHMED v. MALTA
CASE OF ADEN AHMED v. MALTA 55352/12 CAMILLERI M. CAMILLERI K. MLT 7/23/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0723JUD005535212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122894