Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 121 - 140 of 1188
CASE OF BEGHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BEGHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 4755/16 GARCIA LORA N. GBR 2/28/2019 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0228JUD000475516https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-191276
CASE OF BEHAR AND GUTMAN v. BULGARIA
CASE OF BEHAR AND GUTMAN v. BULGARIA 29335/13 KACHAUNOVA A. ILIEVA M. BGR 2/16/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Positive obligations ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD002933513https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207929
CASE OF BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA 41288/15 WINTEMUTE R.W. RASKEVICIUS T.V. LTU 1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD004128815https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200344
CASE OF BELKA v. POLAND
CASE OF BELKA v. POLAND 20870/04 N/A POL 5/18/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518JUD002087004 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BELKA v. POLAND Application no. 20870/04 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 May 2010 FINAL 18/08/2010 This judgment has ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518JUD002087004https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98543
CASE OF BELLI AND ARQUIER-MARTINEZ v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BELLI AND ARQUIER MARTINEZ v. SWITZERLAND 65550/13 SAMBUC H. P. CHE 12/11/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD006555013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188649
CASE OF BENET PRAHA, SPOL. S R.O., v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF BENET PRAHA SPOL. S R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 33908/04 7937/05 25249/05 29402/05 33571/06 KLIMES P. CZE 2/24/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0224JUD003390804https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-103625
CASE OF BENHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BENHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19380/92 N/A GBR 6/10/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Magistrates Court Act 1980 section 111 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0610JUD001938092https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57990
CASE OF BENITEZ MORIANA AND IÑIGO FERNANDEZ v. SPAIN
CASE OF BENITEZ MORIANA AND I IGO FERNANDEZ v. SPAIN 36537/15 36539/15 ARANDA IGLESIAS B. ESP 3/9/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression 149 148 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD003653715 THIRD ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD003653715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208412
CASE OF BERGENS TIDENDE AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF BERGENS TIDENDE AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 26132/95 N/A NOR 5/2/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings 149 148 265 379 579 201 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0502JUD002613295 THIRD ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0502JUD002613295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58797
CASE OF BERGER-KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF BERGER KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA 14717/04 EFERIN LAW FIRM SVN 6/12/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Remainder inadmissible Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD001471704https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144669
CASE OF BESHIRI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
CASE OF BESHIRI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA 7352/03 TARTARI A. ALB 8/22/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 non enforcement Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Violation of P1 1 Remainder inadmissible Damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0822JUD000735203https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76748
CASE OF BESTRY v. POLAND
CASE OF BESTRY v. POLAND 57675/10 ZIELINKO I. POL 11/3/2015 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression 149 148 265 579 379 14 5 238 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103JUD005767510 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103JUD005767510https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158467
CASE OF BETTERIDGE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BETTERIDGE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 1497/10 CHIVERS SOLICITORS GBR 1/29/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Speediness of review 448 438 474 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129JUD000149710https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116121
CASE OF BEYELER v. ITALY
CASE OF BEYELER v. ITALY 33202/96 N/A ITA 1/5/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected estoppel Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 No separate issue under Art. 18 Just satisfaction reserved Law no. 1089 of 1 June 1939 sections 3 30 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0105JUD003320296https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58832
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 3/25/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life No violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141941
CASE OF BIERSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF BIERSKI v. POLAND 46342/19 S UPSKA UCZKIEWICZ B. POL 10/20/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020JUD004634219https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219986
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF BISTROVIC v. CROATIA
CASE OF BISTROVIC v. CROATIA 25774/05 RAMUSCAK M. HRV 5/31/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of P1 1 Partly inadmissible Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD002577405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80705