Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2561 - 2580 of 2580
Vanchev v. Bulgaria
Vanchev v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/130/D/2820/2016 Communication number s : 2820/2016 Author: Mitko Vanchev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Bulgaria Submission date 27 Oct 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2820/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3270/en-US
Weiss v. Austria
Weiss v. Austria CCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002 Communication number s : 1086/2002 Author: Sholam Weiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Austria Submission date 24 May 2002 Date of decision 03 Apr 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of its rules JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1048/en-US
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/63/Add.4 from 27 September 1998 to 2 October 1998 16 December 1998 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Romania 70 6 0 6 105 EQPQOKE CPF 5QEKCN Distr. QWPEKN GENERAL E/CN.4/1999/63/Add.4 16 December 1998 Original: ENGLISH UNSPE/CN.4/1999/63/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f63%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on discrimination against women and girls
Report to HRC A/HRC/26/39/Add.1 from 16 May 2013 to 23 May 2013 16 September 2014 Working Group on discrimination against women and girls Iceland United Nations A/HRC/26/39/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 16 September 2014 Original: English Human UNSPA/HRC/26/39/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f26%2f39%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. United Republic of Tanzania
X v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/18/D/22/2014 Communication number s : 022/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 23 Jun 2014 Date of decision 18 Aug 2017 Comment: JUTBCRPD/C/18/D/22/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2390/en-US
Y v. United Republic of Tanzania
Y v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/20/D/23/2014 Communication number s : 023/2014 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 23 Jun 2014 Date of decision 31 Aug 2018 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/23/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2511/en-US
YONCHEV v. Bulgaria
YONCHEV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: This case concerns the competent authorities failure between 2003 and 2008 to fulfil their positive obligation arising under Article 8 of the Convention to provide the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49163
Yemen’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
Arabic GENEVA 18 January 2019 Yemen s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Wednesday 23 January 2019 in a meeting that will be webcast live . Yemen is one UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/media-advisories/2019/01/yemens-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Zündel (2) v. Canada
Z ndel 2 v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1341/2005 Communication number s : 1341/2005 Author: Ernst Z ndel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jan 2005 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: Request for interim JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1341/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1332/en-US
Z v. United Republic of Tanzania
Z v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/22/D/24/2014 Communication number s : 24/2014 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 12 Jun 2014 Date of decision 19 Sep 2019 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/24/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3131/en-US
Zeynalov v. Estonia
Zeynalov v. Estonia CCPR/C/115/D/2040/2011 Communication number s : 2040/2011 Author: Akhliman Avyaz Ogly Zeynalov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Estonia Submission date 28 Sep 2009 Date of decision 04 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2040/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2082/en-US
Černáková v. Slovakia
ern kov v. Slovakia CAT/C/72/D/890/2018 Communication number s : 890/2018 Author: Lucia ern kov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Slovakia Submission date 10 Jul 2018 Date of decision 19 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/72/D/890/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3337/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
v. Algeria
v. Algeria CAT/C/51/D/376/2009 Communication number s : 376/2009 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Algeria Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/51/D/376/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1798/en-US
v. Burundi
v. Burundi CAT/C/52/D/503/2012 Communication number s : 503/2012 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Burundi Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/503/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1839/en-US
v. Kazakhstan
v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/52/D/497/2012 Communication number s : 497/2012 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Kazakhstan Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/497/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1838/en-US