Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 281 - 286 of 286
X and Z v. Finland
X and Z v. Finland CAT/C/52/D/485/2011 Communication number s : 483/2011 485/2011 Author: Mr. X and Mr. Z both represented by Marjaana Laine of the Refugee Advice Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Finland Submission date 14 JUTBCAT/C/52/D/485/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3225/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013 Communication number s : 2314/2013 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 06 Dec 2013 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2177/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013 Communication number s : 2314/2013 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: arbitrary JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2133/en-US
Z.S. v. Georgia
Z.S. v. Georgia CAT/C/70/D/915/2019 Communication number s : 915/2019 Author: Z.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Georgia Submission date 03 Jan 2019 Date of decision 30 Dec 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/70/D/915/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3421/en-US
Z v. Denmark v. Denmark
Z v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2422/2014 Communication number s : 2422/2014 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2014 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2422/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2096/en-US