Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 147
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/4: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Federated States of Micronesia
United Nations A/HRC/47/4 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/4https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc474-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-federated-states
A/HRC/47/8: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Australia
United Nations A/HRC/47/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/8https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc478-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-australia
Aïcha Habouchi v. Algeria
A cha Habouchi v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016 Communication number s : 2819/2016 Author: A cha Habouchi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Apr 2016 Date of decision 27 Mar 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2871/en-US
B.L. (represented by Balmain for Refugees) v. Australia
B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011 Communication number s : 2053/2011 Author: B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1905/en-US
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 48876/08 ALLEN T. GBR 4/22/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998 Television Act 1954 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0422JUD004887608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119244
CASE OF BERGER-KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF BERGER KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA 14717/04 EFERIN LAW FIRM SVN 6/12/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Remainder inadmissible Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD001471704https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144669
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BOSPHORUS HAVA YOLLARI TURİZM VE TİCARET ANONİM ŞİRKETİ v. IRELAND
CASE OF BOSPHORUS HAVA YOLLARI TUR ZM VE T CARET ANON M RKET v. IRELAND 45036/98 DOYLE J. IRL 6/30/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected out of time non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of P1 1 Constitution Article 29 European ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630JUD004503698https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69564
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY (No. 2) [Extracts]
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY No. 2 Extracts 24069/03 197/04 6201/06 10464/07 OTTY T. MULLER M. TUGLUK A. ERBAS D. DUNDAR I. KAPLAN H. TEPE M. KOSTAK F. AYDINKAYA F. GUNES O. BILMEZ I. KAYA B. TUR S. EMEKCI E. BILGIC K. KORKUT H. SAKAR M. YALCINDAG R. BULGAN N. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD002406903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142087
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28957/95 N/A GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002895795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60596
CASE OF DELFI AS v. ESTONIA
CASE OF DELFI AS v. ESTONIA 64569/09 OTSMANN V. TURK K. EST 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Freedom to impart information Articles 17 19 and 45 of the Constitution ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD006456909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155105
CASE OF HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 2)
CASE OF HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM No. 2 74025/01 ABRAHAMSON E. GBR 10/6/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 3 No separate issue under Art. 14 No separate issue under Art. 10 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006JUD007402501https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-70442
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 50541/08 50571/08 50573/08 40351/09 IRVINE THANVI NATAS BENNATHAN J. ARANI SOLICITORS VULLO S. KING J. FAUL A. GBR 9/13/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6 6 3 c Right to a ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913JUD005054108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-166680
CASE OF KARÁCSONY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
CASE OF KAR CSONY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY 42461/13 44357/13 KARSAI D. HUN 5/17/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Effective domestic remedy Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517JUD004246113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162831
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753