Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 521 - 540 of 603
CASE OF İZZETTİN DOĞAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF ZZETT N DO AN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 62649/10 SOFUOGLU N. SAVASIR I. TOPCU S. KARA F. SUCUOGLU GONEN J. SAHBAZ I. AYDIN M. TUR 4/26/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 9 Freedom of thought conscience and religion Article 9 1 Freedom of religion ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD006264910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162697
Conclusions XVIII-1 - Denmark - Article 5
Conclusions XVIII 1 Denmark Article 5 DNK 05 00 000 30/10/2006 30/10/2006 Article 5 Right to organise The Committee takes note of the information in the Danish report. It refers to its previous conclusion for a description of the situation with respect to ESCXVIII-1/def/DNK/5//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XVIII-1/def/DNK/5//EN
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Dawas and Shava v. Denmark
Dawas and Shava v. Denmark CERD/C/80/D/46/2009 Communication number s : 046/2009 Author: Mahali Dawas and Yousef Shava Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Denmark Submission date 16 Jun 2009 Date of decision 06 Mar 2012 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/80/D/46/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1727/en-US
Decision on the merits: Associazione nazionale sindacato professionisti sanitari della funzione infermieristica - Nursing Up v. Italy, Complaint No. 169/2018
Decision on the merits: Associazione nazionale sindacato professionisti sanitari della funzione infermieristica Nursing Up v. Italy Complaint No. 169/2018 ITA 06 02 000 2022 10 19 2023 02 22 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits ESCcc-169-2018-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-169-2018-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits : Central Union for Child Welfare (CUCW) v. Finland, Complaint No. 139/2016
Decision on the merits : Central Union for Child Welfare CUCW v. Finland Complaint No. 139/2016 FIN 91 175 163 91 176 163 91 207 163 91 00 163 2019 09 11 2020 02 04 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE ESCcc-139-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-139-2016-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Confederazione Generale Sindacale (CGS) and Federazione dei Lavoratori Pubblici e Funzioni pubbliche (FLP) v. Italy, Complaint No. 161/2018
Decision on the merits: Confederazione Generale Sindacale CGS and Federazione dei Lavoratori Pubblici e Funzioni pubbliche FLP v. Italy Complaint No. 161/2018 ITA 06 02 000 05 00 000 21 00 000 22 00 000 91 00 163 93 00 000 2022 10 19 2023 02 22 European ESCcc-161-2018-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-161-2018-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) and European Council for Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) v. Greece, complaint No. 173/2018
Decision on the merits: International Commission of Jurists ICJ and European Council for Refugees and Exiles ECRE v. Greece complaint No. 173/2018 GRC 31 01 163 31 02 163 17 01 163 17 02 163 16 00 000 11 01 000 11 03 000 13 00 000 07 10 000 13 01 000 2021 ESCcc-173-2018-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-173-2018-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH) v. Belgium, Collective Complaint No. 75/2011
Decision on the merits: International Federation of Human Rights FIDH v. Belgium Collective Complaint No. 75/2011 BEL 13 00 000 14 00 000 15 00 000 16 00 000 14 01 000 13 03 000 15 03 163 30 00 163 91 168 163 91 171 163 91 175 163 91 169 163 91 166 163 91 ESCcc-75-2011-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-75-2011-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. France, Complaint No. 130/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. France Complaint No. 130/2016 FRA 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-130-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-130-2016-dmerits-en
Deepan Budlakoti v. Canada
Deepan Budlakoti v. Canada CCPR/C/122/D/2264/2013 Communication number s : 2264/2013 Author: Deepan Budlakoti Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jul 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2264/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2479/en-US
Dudko v. Australia
Dudko v. Australia CCPR/C/90/D/1347/2005 Communication number s : 1347/2005 Author: Lucy Dudko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2004 Date of decision 23 Jul 2007 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1347/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1368/en-US
F.F.J.H. v. Argentina
F.F.J.H. v. Argentina CCPR/C/132/D/3238/2018 Communication number s : 3238/2018 Author: F.F.J.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Argentina Submission date 28 Aug 2018 Date of decision 08 Jul 2021 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3238/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3193/en-US
F.H.A. v. Denmark
F.H.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/75/D/108/2016 Communication number s : 108/2016 Author: F.H.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 17 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/108/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2704/en-US
F.M. v. Canada
F.M. v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2284/2013 Communication number s : 2284/2013 Author: F.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 16 Aug 2013 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2284/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2025/en-US
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT UKRAINE
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT UKRAINE UKR 2017 06 23 2017 08 08 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-9-Ukraine-ENGhttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-9-Ukraine-ENG
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on the Slovak Republic
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on the Slovak Republic SVK 2019 06 21 2019 08 22 Adoption: 21 June 2019 Publication: 22 August 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 9 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)9-Final-eng-SlovakRep-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)9-Final-eng-SlovakRep-PUBLIC
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - GERMANY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention GERMANY DEU a22 a57 aco GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)21_eng_Germany_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)21_eng_Germany_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US
J.I. v. Finland
J.I. v. Finland CEDAW/C/69/D/103/2016 Communication number s : 103/2016 Author: J.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Finland Submission date Date of decision 05 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/103/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2432/en-US