Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 31
CASE OF BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA 41288/15 WINTEMUTE R.W. RASKEVICIUS T.V. LTU 1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD004128815https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200344
CASE OF BELLI AND ARQUIER-MARTINEZ v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BELLI AND ARQUIER MARTINEZ v. SWITZERLAND 65550/13 SAMBUC H. P. CHE 12/11/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD006555013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188649
CASE OF BERGER-KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF BERGER KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA 14717/04 EFERIN LAW FIRM SVN 6/12/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Remainder inadmissible Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD001471704https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144669
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28957/95 N/A GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002895795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60596
CASE OF EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6339/05 LYONS M. GBR 4/10/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 and Schedule 3 Human Fertilisation and Embryology ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410JUD000633905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80046
CASE OF EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6339/05 LYONS M. GBR 3/7/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 Indication under Rule 39 continued until judgment becomes final or until further order Human ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307JUD000633905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72684
CASE OF FÁBIÁN v. HUNGARY
CASE OF F BI N v. HUNGARY 78117/13 GR D A. HUN 9/5/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Deprivation of property Peaceful enjoyment of possessions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD007811713https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-176769
CASE OF GRANOS ORGANICOS NACIONALES S.A. v. GERMANY
CASE OF GRANOS ORGANICOS NACIONALES S.A. v. GERMANY 19508/07 GOMEZ DE LARRAIN E. DEU 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Fair hearing Legal aid No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD001950807https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109807
CASE OF HÄMÄLÄINEN v. FINLAND
CASE OF H M L INEN v. FINLAND 37359/09 COJOCARIU C. FIN 7/16/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0716JUD003735909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145768
CASE OF HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 2)
CASE OF HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM No. 2 74025/01 ABRAHAMSON E. GBR 10/6/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 3 No separate issue under Art. 14 No separate issue under Art. 10 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006JUD007402501https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-70442
CASE OF HOPPEN AND TRADE UNION OF AB AMBER GRID EMPLOYEES v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF HOPPEN AND TRADE UNION OF AB AMBER GRID EMPLOYEES v. LITHUANIA 976/20 PA KEVI I T A. LTU 1/17/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 14 11 1 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD000097620https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222320
CASE OF I. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF I. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25680/94 GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 451 429 310 450 240 343 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002568094https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60595
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 N/A RUS 10/7/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Respondent State to take measures of a general ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100926
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 MOSKALENKO K. LISMAN N GERASIMOVA I. RUS 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109868
CASE OF MELNYCHENKO v. UKRAINE
CASE OF MELNYCHENKO v. UKRAINE 17707/02 HOLOVATYY Serhiy UKR 10/19/2004 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Law on elections of 18 October 2001 as amended on ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1019JUD001770702https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67100
CASE OF OPUZ v. TURKEY
CASE OF OPUZ v. TURKEY 33401/02 BESTAS M. TUR 6/9/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed six month period Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 3 Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0609JUD003340102https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92945
CASE OF SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA
CASE OF SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA 49270/11 NIKU CEVA I. LVA 6/9/2022 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD004927011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-217963
CASE OF SHINDLER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SHINDLER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19840/09 STUDIO LEGALE PAOLETTI GBR 5/7/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Right to free elections general Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Vote 343 100 183 498 14 128 574 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0507JUD001984009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119229
CASE OF SLIVENKO v. LATVIA
CASE OF SLIVENKO v. LATVIA 48321/99 N/A LVA 10/9/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 5 4 Non pecuniary damage financial award Latvian Russian Treaty on the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1009JUD004832199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61334