Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1261 - 1280 of 1350
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - ROMANIA
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention ROMANIA ROU a13 a20 a22 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2022_6_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2022_6_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) SAN MARINO
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention SAN MARINO SMR lps 2021 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2021)6_San-Marino_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2021)6_San-Marino_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gomaríz Valera v. Spain
Gomar z Valera v. Spain CCPR/C/84/D/1095/2002 Communication number s : 1095/2002 Author: Bernardino Gomar z Valera Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Spain Submission date 04 Sep 1997 Date of decision 22 Jul 2005 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1095/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1191/en-US
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/536/2013 Communication number s : 536/2013 Author: H.B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 14 Nov 2012 Date of decision 02 Dec 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/536/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2070/en-US
HROMADKA AND HROMADKOVA v. Russia
HROMADKA AND HROMADKOVA v. Russia RUS 11/03/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:34:16 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of international child abductions and problems related to application of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26420
Hertzberg et al. v. Finland
Hertzberg et al. v. Finland CCPR/C/15/D/61/1979 Communication number s : 061/1979 Author: Leo R. Hertzberg Ulf Mansson Astrid Nikula and Marko Tuovi Putkonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Finland Submission date 07 Aug 1979 JUTBCCPR/C/15/D/61/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/337/en-US
Howard v. Canada
Howard v. Canada CCPR/C/84/D/879/1999 Communication number s : 879/1999 Author: George Howard Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Canada Submission date 09 Oct 1998 Date of decision 26 Jul 2005 Comment: The Committee did not accept JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/879/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1172/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Ecuador, Tunisia, and Morocco
AFTERNOON 24 March 2023 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Ecuador Tunisia and Morocco. The Council adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Ecuador. The Vice President said that out of 174 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-ecuador-tunisia-and
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2000/110 from 14 November 1999 to 24 November 1999 26 January 2000 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia Somalia UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2000/110 26 January 2000 UNSPE/CN.4/2000/110https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2000%2f110&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2003/115 from 26 August 2002 to 6 September 2002 31 December 2002 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia Somalia E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2003/115 31 December 2002 UNSPE/CN.4/2003/115https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2003%2f115&Lang=en
J.B. v. Switzerland
J.B. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/721/2015 Communication number s : 721/2015 Author: J.B. represented by counsel Boris Wijkstr m and Gabriella Tau Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/721/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2403/en-US
J.I. v. Finland
J.I. v. Finland CEDAW/C/69/D/103/2016 Communication number s : 103/2016 Author: J.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Finland Submission date Date of decision 05 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/103/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2432/en-US
J.M. v. Chile
J.M. v. Chile CRC/C/90/D/121/2020 Communication number s : 121/2020 Author: N.E.R. . Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Chile Submission date 09 Jul 2020 Date of decision 01 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/90/D/121/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3055/en-US
Jessop v. New Zealand
Jessop v. New Zealand CCPR/C/101/D/1758/2008 Communication number s : 1758/2008 Author: Emelysifa Jessop Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country New Zealand Submission date 16 Oct 2007 Date of decision 29 Mar 2011 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1758/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1620/en-US
Jonassen et al. v. Norway
Jonassen et al. v. Norway CCPR/C/76/D/942/2000 Communication number s : 942/2000 Author: Jarle Jonassen and members of the Riast/Hylling reindeer herding district Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Norway Submission date 09 JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/942/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1017/en-US
Käkkäläjärvi et al. v. Finland
K kk l j rvi et al. v. Finland CCPR/C/124/D/2950/2017 Communication number s : 2950/2017 Author: Klemetti K kk l j rvi et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Finland Submission date 23 Mar 2016 Date of decision 02 Nov 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2950/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3322/en-US
Kalevi Paadar, Eero Paadar and his family, Veijo Paadar, and Kari Alatorvinen and his family v. Finland
Kalevi Paadar Eero Paadar and his family Veijo Paadar and Kari Alatorvinen and his family v. Finland CCPR/C/110/D/2102/2011 Communication number s : 2102/2011 Author: Kalevi Paadar Eero Paadar and his family Veijo Paadar and Kari Alatorvinen and his JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2102/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1817/en-US
Kitok v. Sweden
Kitok v. Sweden CCPR/C/33/D/197/1985 Communication number s : 197/1985 Author: Ivan Kitok Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 33 Country Sweden Submission date 02 Dec 1985 Date of decision 27 Jul 1988 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/33/D/197/1985https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/543/en-US
L.T.K. v. Finland
L.T.K. v. Finland CCPR/C/25/D/185/1984 Communication number s : 185/1984 Author: L.T.K. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 25 Country Finland Submission date 18 Oct 1984 Date of decision 09 Jul 1985 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/25/D/185/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/561/en-US