Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1268
11. Convention on the Rights of the Child
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. Convention on the Rights of the Child New York 20 November 1989 Entry into force : 2 September 1990 in accordance with article 49 1 . Registration : 2 September 1990 No. 27531 Status : UNIV-11https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en
11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children child prostitution and child pornography New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 18 January 2002 in UNIV-11-chttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-c&chapter=4&clang=_en
3rd General Report on GREVIO’s activities
3rd General Report on GREVIO s activities 2022 06 14 2022 06 14 cyclePhraseHere Publication date: 14/06/2022 3rd GENERAL REPORT ON GREVIO S ACTIVITIES GREVIO Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence covering the GREVIO3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOChttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOC
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.B. v. Finland
A.B. v. Finland CRC/C/86/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 051/2018 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Finland Submission date 27 Jun 2018 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/86/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2946/en-US
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A.M.D. et al. v. Denmark
A.M.D. et al. v. Denmark CAT/C/60/D/653/2015 Communication number s : 653/2015 Author: A.M.D. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Denmark Submission date 24 Dec 2014 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/60/D/653/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3429/en-US
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014 Communication number s : 2409/2014 Author: Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date Date JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2134/en-US
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014 Communication number s : 2409/2014 Author: Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 28 JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2178/en-US
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems (ETS No. 189)
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems ETS No. 189 189 Strasbourg 2003 01 28T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the States which COEETS No. 189https://rm.coe.int/168008160f
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Alger v. Australia
Alger v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013 Communication number s : 2237/2013 Author: Christopher Alger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2315/en-US
Ali and Ali v. Norway
Ali and Ali v. Norway CCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017 Communication number s : 2926/2017 Author: Imran Ali and Bakhtaware Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Norway Submission date 04 Jan 2017 Date of decision 14 Jul 2022 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3677/en-US
Anderson v. Australia
Anderson v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005 Communication number s : 1367/2005 Author: Tim Anderson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 26 Jul 2004 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1306/en-US
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201