Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 3959
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
B. & C. v. Czech Republic
B. C. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010 Communication number s : 1967/2010 Author: B. and C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Sep 2009 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1944/en-US
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
BACKLUND v. Finland
BACKLUND v. Finland FIN 06/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 The text for this case is undergoing review and will be published at a later date Finland EXEC 59453 02112016, text, undergoing, review, published EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6032
BECKER v. Finland
BECKER v. Finland FIN 18/11/2014 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 The text for this case is undergoing review and will be published at a later date Finland EXEC 27854 text, undergoing, review, published https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4988 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4988
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BRUNCRONA v. Finland
BRUNCRONA v. Finland FIN 16/02/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on account of the procedure adopted in terminating the applicants proprietary interest in certain islands i.e. by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4846
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal CCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009 Communication number s : 1863/2009 Author: Dev Bahadur Maharjan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1238/en-US
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/112/D/2137/2012 Communication number s : 2137/2012 Author: Bakhytzhan Toregozhina not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 30 Jun 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2137/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1935/en-US
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/126/D/2311/2013 Communication number s : 2311/2013 Author: Bakhytzhan Toregozhina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 30 May 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2311/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2902/en-US
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
Berhane v. Switzerland
Berhane v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/872/2018 Communication number s : 872/2018 Author: Yacob Berhane Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 May 2018 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/73/D/872/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3138/en-US
Bibaud v. Canada
Bibaud v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1747/2008 Communication number s : 1747/2008 Author: Mireille Boisvert Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 23 Jul 2008 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1747/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1577/en-US
Brada v. France
Brada v. France CAT/C/34/D/195/2002 Communication number s : 195/2002 Author: Mafhoud Brada Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country France Submission date 29 Nov 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2005 Comment: HR/CAT/PUB/1 p. 146 Substantive JUTBCAT/C/34/D/195/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/137/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
C.E.A. v. Finland
C.E.A. v. Finland CCPR/C/42/D/316/1988 Communication number s : 316/1988 Author: C.E.A. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 42 Country Finland Submission date 04 Jul 1988 Date of decision 10 Jul 1991 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/42/D/316/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/578/en-US
C.F.T. v. Switzerland
C.F.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/829/2017 Communication number s : 829/2017 Author: C.F.T. represented by counsel Coordination Asyle Migration Riviera Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 05 Jun 2017 Date JUTBCAT/C/66/D/829/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2588/en-US