Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 112
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE 22689/07 MONGET SARRAIL D. FRA 12/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim Violation of Article 13 8 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 8 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115498
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS 43494/09 WIJLING R.S. NLD 11/6/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom to choose residence Sections 5 2 6 2 7 1 b and 17 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1106JUD004349409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177406
CASE OF GLOR v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF GLOR v. SWITZERLAND 13444/04 VON PLANTA STING D. CHE 4/30/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 14 8 Sections 2 et 4 paragraph 1 a of the federal military service exemption tax Act Sections 13 paragraph 2 a and 42 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0430JUD001344404https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92525
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 10865/09 45886/07 32431/08 POPESCU A. SFIRAIALA I. MATEI I. NACEA D. HARTNEANU D.O. ROU 9/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Six month period Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
CASE OF T.K. AND S.R. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF T.K. AND S.R. v. RUSSIA 28492/15 49975/15 YERMOLAYEVA N. RUS 11/19/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Kyrgyzstan 350 618 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215 THIRD SECTION CASE OF T.K. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198477
CASE OF Y.P. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF Y.P. v. RUSSIA 43399/13 TOMAROVSKIY P. RUS 9/20/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920JUD004339913https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219209
Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United States, holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United States and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Harold Hongju Koh Legal Adviser of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-states-holds-general
Council holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concludes the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms
Human Rights CouncilAFTERNOON17 March 2017The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concluded the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms. In the general debate on the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review-and-concludes-general
Independent Expert on the effect of economic reform policies and foreign debt on the full enjoyment of all human rights
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/46/Add.1 from 27 July 2005 to 29 July 2005 27 March 2006 Independent Expert on the effect of economic reform policies and foreign debt on the full enjoyment of all human rights Mozambique UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social UNSPE/CN.4/2006/46/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f46%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights
Report to HRC A/HRC/20/23/Add.2 from 25 July 2011 to 5 August 2011 11 June 2012 Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights particularly UNSPA/HRC/20/23/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f20%2f23%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2004/43 from 18 November 2003 to 20 November 2003 29 February 2004 Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty Sudan UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2004/43 29 February UNSPE/CN.4/2004/43https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2004%2f43&Lang=en
Katsaris v. Greece
Katsaris v. Greece CCPR/C/105/D/1558/2007 Communication number s : 1558/2007 Author: Nikolaos Katsaris Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Greece Submission date 06 Oct 2006 Date of decision 18 Jul 2012 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1558/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1434/en-US
Lukpan Akhmedyarov v. Kazakhstan
Lukpan Akhmedyarov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/129/D/2535/2015 Communication number s : 2535/2015 Author: Lukpan Akhmedyarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2535/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2860/en-US