Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 116
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF ABDULLAHI ELMI AND AWEYS ABUBAKAR v. MALTA
CASE OF ABDULLAHI ELMI AND AWEYS ABUBAKAR v. MALTA 25794/13 28151/13 CAMILLERI M. CAMILLERI K. MLT 11/22/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 5 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD002579413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168780
CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA
CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA 23459/03 CARBONNEAU A. BURNS J.M. KHACHATRYAN R. ARM 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 9 Non pecuniary damage award Article 75 of the Criminal Code 154 237 152 269 354 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002345903 GRAND CHAMBER ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002345903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105611
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY (No. 2) [Extracts]
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY No. 2 Extracts 24069/03 197/04 6201/06 10464/07 OTTY T. MULLER M. TUGLUK A. ERBAS D. DUNDAR I. KAPLAN H. TEPE M. KOSTAK F. AYDINKAYA F. GUNES O. BILMEZ I. KAYA B. TUR S. EMEKCI E. BILGIC K. KORKUT H. SAKAR M. YALCINDAG R. BULGAN N. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD002406903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142087
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE 22689/07 MONGET SARRAIL D. FRA 12/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim Violation of Article 13 8 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 8 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115498
CASE OF GLOR v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF GLOR v. SWITZERLAND 13444/04 VON PLANTA STING D. CHE 4/30/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 14 8 Sections 2 et 4 paragraph 1 a of the federal military service exemption tax Act Sections 13 paragraph 2 a and 42 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0430JUD001344404https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92525
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 19750/13 DAJBYCH J. CZE 6/1/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art 35 1 Four month period former six month Inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art 35 1 Four month ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0601JUD001975013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225231
CASE OF GUISSET v. FRANCE
CASE OF GUISSET v. FRANCE 33933/96 FRA 9/26/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 on account of the lack of a hearing in public Violation of Art. 6 1 on account of the length of the proceedings Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0926JUD003393396https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58810
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 10865/09 45886/07 32431/08 POPESCU A. SFIRAIALA I. MATEI I. NACEA D. HARTNEANU D.O. ROU 9/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Six month period Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
CASE OF Y.P. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF Y.P. v. RUSSIA 43399/13 TOMAROVSKIY P. RUS 9/20/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920JUD004339913https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219209
CERD/C/VAT/CO/16-23 HOLY SEE
CERD/C/VAT/CO/16 23 HOLY SEE CERD/C/VAT/CO/16 23 NULL 2016 01 10T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/VAT/CO/16 23 Distr.: General 11 January 2016 International Convention onthe Elimination of All Formsof Racial Discrimination Original: English Committee UHRICERD/C/VAT/CO/16-23https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9cbf3160-0f58-4e12-8b9a-9866538d69cf
Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United States, holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United States and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Harold Hongju Koh Legal Adviser of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-states-holds-general
Council holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concludes the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms
Human Rights CouncilAFTERNOON17 March 2017The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concluded the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms. In the general debate on the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review-and-concludes-general
Evelio Ramón Giménez v. Paraguay
Evelio Ram n Gim nez v. Paraguay CCPR/C/123/D/2372/2014 Communication number s : 2372/2014 Author: Evelio Ram n Gim nez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Paraguay Submission date 30 Jul 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2018 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2372/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2542/en-US
Fillastre v. Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Fillastre v. Bolivia Plurinational State of CCPR/C/43/D/336/1988 Communication number s : 336/1988 Author: Nicole Fillastre victim s wife Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 43 Country Bolivia Plurinational State of Submission date 27 Sep 1988 JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/336/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/516/en-US
Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2004/43 from 18 November 2003 to 20 November 2003 29 February 2004 Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty Sudan UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2004/43 29 February UNSPE/CN.4/2004/43https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2004%2f43&Lang=en