Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 101 - 120 of 160
CASE OF TEPE v. TURKEY
CASE OF TEPE v. TURKEY 27244/95 N/A TUR 5/9/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 2 with regard to abduction and killing Violation of Art. 2 with regard to lack of effective investigation No violation of Art. 3 and 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0509JUD002724495https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61089
CASE OF THOMPSON v. RUSSIA
CASE OF THOMPSON v. RUSSIA 36048/17 ZUYEV A.Y. KHAZOVA O. RUS 3/30/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0330JUD003604817https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208878
CASE OF ŠTULÍŘ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF TUL v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 36705/12 PETERA J. CZE 1/12/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 6 3 d Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 3 d Examination of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD003670512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170059
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CASE OF VALDÍS FJÖLNISDÓTTIR AND OTHERS v. ICELAND
CASE OF VALD S FJ LNISD TTIR AND OTHERS v. ICELAND 71552/17 STEINGR MSD TTIR . ISL 5/18/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518JUD007155217https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209992
CASE OF VLADIMIR USHAKOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF VLADIMIR USHAKOV v. RUSSIA 15122/17 YABLOKOVA L.A. RUS 6/18/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non pecuniary damage award Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618JUD001512217https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-193878
CASE OF WDOWIAK v. POLAND
CASE OF WDOWIAK v. POLAND 28768/12 DROZD A. POL 2/7/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD002876812 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD002876812https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170860
CASE OF ĆWIK v. POLAND
CASE OF WIK v. POLAND 31454/10 ILASZ L. POL 11/5/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD003145410https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205536
CASE OF WILDGRUBER (No. 2) v. GERMANY
CASE OF WILDGRUBER No. 2 v. GERMANY 42402/05 42423/05 RIXE G. DEU 1/21/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 13 445 444 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0121JUD004240205 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF WILDGRUBER v. GERMANY Applications no. 42402/05 and no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0121JUD004240205https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96892
CASE OF WLOCH v. POLAND
CASE OF WLOCH v. POLAND 27785/95 N/A POL 10/19/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection rejected abuse of process No violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 6 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1019JUD002778595https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58893
CASE OF X v. FINLAND
CASE OF X v. FINLAND 34806/04 MOLANDER H. FIN 7/3/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Article 5 1 e Persons of unsound mind Violation of Article 8 Right to respect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD003480604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111938
CASE OF X v. LATVIA
CASE OF X v. LATVIA 27853/09 STRAUSS R. LVA 12/13/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award 451 425 268 376 319 354 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD002785309 THIRD SECTION CASE OF X v. LATVIA Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD002785309https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107888
CASE OF X v. LATVIA
CASE OF X v. LATVIA 27853/09 STRAUSS R. LVA 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Section 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Act 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002785309https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138992
CASE OF Y.S. AND O.S. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF Y.S. AND O.S. v. RUSSIA 17665/17 LAPTEV A.N. RUS 6/15/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Article 41 Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0615JUD001766517https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210414
CASE OF Y.Y. AND Y.Y. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF Y.Y. AND Y.Y. v. RUSSIA 43229/18 KOGAN V. WESSELINK E. STICHTING RUSSIAN JUSTICE INITIATIVE RUS 3/8/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0308JUD004322918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216018
CASE OF YILDIRIM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF YILDIRIM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 56154/00 OKCUOGLU S. lawyer Istanbul TUR 10/19/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 3 Not ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019JUD005615400https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77580
Djebbar and Chihoub v. Algeria
Djebbar and Chihoub v. Algeria CCPR/C/103/D/1811/2008 Communication number s : 1811/2008 Author: Taous Djebbar and Saadi Chihoub Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Algeria Submission date 25 Aug 2008 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1811/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1227/en-US
H.A. v. Sweden
H.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/63/D/744/2016 Communication number s : 744/2016 Author: H.A. represented by counsel Viktoria Nystr m Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Apr 2016 Date of decision 11 May 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/63/D/744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2737/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sudan and Hungary
Human Rights Council MORNING 23 September 2011 Continues General Debate on Human Rights Situations that Require the Council s Attention The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Saint Vincent and the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-saint-vincent
Independent Expert on human rights in Burundi
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/109 from 4 October 2005 to 15 October 2005 23 December 2005 Independent Expert on human rights in Burundi Burundi UNITED NATIONS E Distr.GENERAL Economic and Social Council E/CN.4/2006/10923 December 2005 Original: ENGLISH UNSPE/CN.4/2006/109https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f109&Lang=en