Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10
CASE OF BÉDAT v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF B DAT v. SWITZERLAND 56925/08 PONCET C. HOFFMANN D. CHE 3/29/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom to impart information Freedom to receive information Article 293 of the Swiss Criminal Code ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329JUD005692508https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161898
CASE OF CIMPERŠEK v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF CIMPER EK v. SLOVENIA 58512/16 CIMPER EK T. SVN 6/30/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD005851216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203307
CASE OF ČEFERIN v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF EFERIN v. SLOVENIA 40975/08 ODVETNI KA DRU BA EFERIN SVN 1/16/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116JUD004097508https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-180286
CASE OF EMİNAĞAOĞLU v. TURKEY
CASE OF EM NA AO LU v. TURKEY 76521/12 AKG L DO USOY P. TUR 3/9/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD007652112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208800
CASE OF GUZ v. POLAND
CASE OF GUZ v. POLAND 965/12 POL 10/15/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015JUD000096512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205051
CASE OF MILJEVIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF MILJEVI v. CROATIA 68317/13 KOSTANJ EK Z. HRV 6/25/2020 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD006831713https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203169
CASE OF PANIOGLU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF PANIOGLU v. ROMANIA 33794/14 POPESCU C.L. ROU 12/8/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1208JUD003379414https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206352
CASE OF RADOBULJAC v. CROATIA
CASE OF RADOBULJAC v. CROATIA 51000/11 N/A HRV 6/28/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression 149 148 265 235 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628JUD005100011 SECOND SECTION CASE OF RADOBULJAC v. CROATIA ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628JUD005100011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164315
CASE OF STANCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF STANCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 22953/16 POPESCU C.L. ROU 10/18/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage award Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018JUD002295316https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219982
CASE OF ZUGIC v. CROATIA
CASE OF ZUGIC v. CROATIA 3699/08 N/A HRV 5/31/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 10 Section 62 of the 1999 Constitutional Court Act Sections 10 and 110 of the 1977 Civil Procedure Act Sections 10 and 52 of the 2008 Amendments to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0531JUD000369908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104933