Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 828
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
3rd General Report on GREVIO’s activities
3rd General Report on GREVIO s activities 2022 06 14 2022 06 14 cyclePhraseHere Publication date: 14/06/2022 3rd GENERAL REPORT ON GREVIO S ACTIVITIES GREVIO Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence covering the GREVIO3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOChttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOC
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. b Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. b Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 18 December 2002 Entry into force : 22 June 2006 in accordance UNIV-9-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
AGACHE v. Romania
AGACHE v. Romania ROU 04/01/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: failure of authorities to secure the prompt recovery of the damages awarded to the applicant by a criminal ruling of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13399
APEH ULDOZOTTEINEK SZOVETSEGE, IVANYI, ROTH AND SZERDAHELYI v. Hungary
APEH ULDOZOTTEINEK SZOVETSEGE IVANYI ROTH AND SZERDAHELYI v. Hungary HUN 05/01/2001 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair non contentious proceedings in regard to the applicant association s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11276
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BALOGH v. Hungary
BALOGH v. Hungary HUN 14/12/2017 00:00:00 15/12/2017 17:20:13 Case Description: Functioning of justice and lack of a remedy: Excessive length of judicial proceedings in civil criminal and administrative matters and lacking remedy in this respect. Articles EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48545
BARTOS v. Hungary
BARTOS v. Hungary HUN 17/01/2019 00:00:00 28/01/2019 17:04:43 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of judicial proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51327
BLOCK v. Hungary
BLOCK v. Hungary HUN 25/04/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to infringement of the applicant s right to be informed in detail of the nature and cause of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11546
BODINE BENCZE v. Hungary
BODINE BENCZE v. Hungary HUN 01/10/2002 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11280
BOZA v. Hungary
BOZA v. Hungary HUN 17/01/2019 00:00:00 28/01/2019 17:04:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of judicial proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51285
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA 57864/17 79087/17 55353/19 BAKHTADZE K. LEACH P. REMEZAITE R. GAVRON J. SAWYER J. CLIFFORD J. JOMARJIDZE N. ONIANI T. TABATADZE G. COJOCARIU C. LEVINE K. EVANS J. GEO 12/1/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD005786417https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-221237
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390
CASE OF A.K. v. LATVIA
CASE OF A.K. v. LATVIA 33011/08 OLSENA S. LVA 6/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for private life Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD003301108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145005