Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 146
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25599/94 N/A GBR 9/23/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002559994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58232
CASE OF ABDOELLA v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF ABDOELLA v. THE NETHERLANDS 12728/87 N/A NLD 11/25/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected out of time Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Code of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1125JUD001272887https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57765
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22954/93 N/A GBR 9/2/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 11 No violation of P1 3 Local Government and Housing Act 1989 sections 1 5 2 2 2 3 Schedule to the Local Government Officers ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0902JUD002295493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58222
CASE OF AHMED v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF AHMED v. AUSTRIA 25964/94 N/A AUT 12/17/1996 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction new complaint Violation of Art. 3 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1217JUD002596494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58001
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 18465/91 N/A GBR 5/5/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 sections 139 1 and 5 141 1 142 152 Schedule 3 paras. 6 7 and 16 1952 Act on customs 1876 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0505JUD001846591https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57939
CASE OF AKTAŞ v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKTA v. TURKEY 24351/94 N/A TUR 4/24/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0424JUD002435194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61055
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF ALLENET DE RIBEMONT v. FRANCE (INTERPRETATION)
CASE OF ALLENET DE RIBEMONT v. FRANCE INTERPRETATION 15175/89 N/A FRA 8/7/1996 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction interpretation in abstract Interpretation 26 126 214 143 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0807JUD001517589 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ALLENET DE RIBEMONT v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0807JUD001517589https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57987
CASE OF ANDRONICOU AND CONSTANTINOU v. CYPRUS
CASE OF ANDRONICOU AND CONSTANTINOU v. CYPRUS 25052/94 N/A CYP 10/9/1997 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected abuse of process Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 6 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1009JUD002505294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58102
CASE OF ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 24760/94 KALAYDJIEVA Z. BGR 10/28/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed abuse of process Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 3 ill treatment Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002476094https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58261
CASE OF B. v. FRANCE
CASE OF B. v. FRANCE 13343/87 N/A FRA 3/25/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Preliminary objection rejected six month period Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 Non pecuniary damage financial award Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0325JUD001334387https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57770
CASE OF BENHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BENHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19380/92 N/A GBR 6/10/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Magistrates Court Act 1980 section 111 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0610JUD001938092https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57990
CASE OF BOTTA v. ITALY
CASE OF BOTTA v. ITALY 21439/93 N/A ITA 2/24/1998 12:00:00 AM Art. 8 inapplicable Art. 14 inapplicable Law no. 13 of 9 January 1989 sections 1 2 10 and 11 Law no. 104 of 5 February 1992 sections 23 3 41 8 and 42 451 429 343 100 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0224JUD002143993https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58140
CASE OF BOWMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BOWMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24839/94 N/A GBR 2/19/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim Violation of Art. 10 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002483994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58134
CASE OF BRANNIGAN AND McBRIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRANNIGAN AND McBRIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 14553/89 14554/89 N/A GBR 5/26/1993 12:00:00 AM Derogation of Art. 5 3 satisfies the requirements of Art. 15 No violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 13 Prevention of Terrorism Temporary Provisions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0526JUD001455389https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57819
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 11209/84 11234/84 11266/84 11386/85 N/A GBR 11/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1129JUD001120984https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57450
CASE OF BUCKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BUCKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 20348/92 N/A GBR 9/25/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 sections 77 78 and 80 Circular 28 77 Department of the Environment of 25 March 1977 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0925JUD002034892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58076
CASE OF CARDOT v. FRANCE
CASE OF CARDOT v. FRANCE 11069/84 N/A FRA 3/19/1991 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction complaint inadmissible Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 437 and 513 second paragraph 14 128 445 136 122 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0319JUD001106984 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF CARDOT ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0319JUD001106984https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57715
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22414/93 N/A GBR 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58004